Pulaski County AR data center regulations ordinance 26-I-56B (vetoed Sept 2026)

Pulaski County, AR — Quorum Court Passes Data Center ('High-Intensity Digital Infrastructure') Regulations Ordinance 26-I-56B 11-4; County Judge Barry Hyde Vetoes It, Override Sought (September 2026)
Pulaski County, AR · Pulaski County, Ark., Ordinance 26-I-56B (passed 11-4 Sept. 22, 2026; vetoed Sept. 25, 2026)

Status
Vetoed
Applies to
Developers/operators of high-intensity digital infrastructure (large data centers) in unincorporated Pulaski County (if the veto is overridden)
Enforced by
Pulaski County (planning director / Planning Board)

On September 22, 2026 the Pulaski County Quorum Court voted 11-4 for the county's first ordinance regulating large data centers in unincorporated areas, creating a county permitting process for 'high-intensity digital infrastructure' with rules on noise, fire and safety, water, environmental impact and setbacks. Projects would have to submit electrical load analyses, water and wastewater plans, land-use suitability studies and a decommissioning plan, and show they would not 'materially impair' utilities serving neighbors; AVAIO Digital's planned Wrightsville campus would not be grandfathered. County Judge Barry Hyde vetoed it on September 25, 2026, citing litigation risk and the county's capacity to administer it. Overriding the veto takes nine of 15 votes at the next regular Quorum Court meeting, and the sponsor says members will try.

Who is protected: Residents and property owners near prospective large-scale data centers in Pulaski County, AR

Legal detail

Pulaski County, Ark., Ordinance No. 26-I-56B (number per KATV). Passed by the 15-member Quorum Court 11-4 on Tuesday, Sept. 22, 2026 (yes: Blackwood, Capps, Davis, Massey, McCoy, Lewison, Person, Keith, Ward, Young-Baker, Medlock; no: Curry, Robinson, Elliott and one other per the 11-4 count). Carried an emergency clause making it effective immediately unless vetoed within seven days (Arkansas Times, Sept. 22). Content as reported: new permitting process for 'high-intensity digital infrastructure'; permits, noise abatement, fire/safety, water consumption, environmental impact, setbacks; submissions of electrical load analyses, water/wastewater plans, land-use suitability studies, decommissioning plan; must not 'materially impair' utilities/infrastructure serving surrounding properties; no cap on water or power use (Arkansas Advocate). Applies to projects lacking all 'final county approvals' before the effective date, with the planning director deciding exemption (Democrat-Gazette). AVAIO Digital's Wrightsville project not grandfathered (Blackwood). VETO: Friday Sept. 25, 2026, by letter to County Clerk Terri Hollingsworth; reasons per KATV: state-law and property-rights questions, appeal provisions needing compliance with Arkansas law, regulatory system (25-OR-19) the county cannot yet administer, financial consequences, litigation risk ('official immunity should not be misunderstood'). OVERRIDE: three-fifths (9 of 15) and, under the county code, must occur at the next regular Quorum Court meeting after written notice of the veto; failure means the veto stands (Democrat-Gazette). NOT ESTABLISHED: override meeting date/outcome; specific setback distances or noise limits; penalties. Distinct from the failed May 2026 moratorium (Proposed 12-Month Data Center Moratorium (failed to pass)).

Key facts

JurisdictionPulaski County, AR
LevelCounty
CitationPulaski County, Ark., Ordinance 26-I-56B (passed 11-4 Sept. 22, 2026; vetoed Sept. 25, 2026)
Private right of actionNo, agency enforcement only
PenaltiesNot stated in the located sources
Topicsdata-center siting and energy
News reportJudge Barry Hyde vetoes data center ordinance — KATV

More AI rules in Pulaski County, AR

Related data-center siting and energy rules elsewhere

See something wrong or out of date? Submit a correction. Every entry must carry a verifiable source.