California SB 1119 Adam's Law, companion chatbots (2026)
California — SB 1119, Adam's Law: Time Limits for Minors on Companion Chatbots, Crisis Resources, a Duty to Alert Parents When Self-Harm Is Detected, Pre-Deployment Risk Assessments and Company Liability (Signed September 10, 2026)
California · Cal. S.B. 1119 (2025-2026 Reg. Sess.), Stats. 2026, ch. 190 — Adam's Law, Bus. & Prof. Code § 21810 et seq. (approved September 10, 2026; main duties operative July 1, 2027)
- Status
- Enacted (not yet in effect)
- Takes effect
- July 1, 2027
- Applies to
- Operators of companion chatbots accessible to minors in California — required to impose time limits, supply mental health resources, maintain safety plans, alert parents on detected self-harm and complete pre-deployment risk assessments
- Enforced by
- California state enforcement; private liability created by the statute
California Senate Bill 1119, which the law itself names "Adam's Law" (press coverage calls it the Adam Raine Law), was signed by Governor Gavin Newsom on September 10, 2026 (Chapter 190). Starting July 1, 2027, companies that run companion chatbots must protect users under 18. By default, a child can chat for no more than one hour at a time and two hours a day, and only a parent can change those limits. Operators must have a crisis plan that points a child to crisis services, must tell a parent as soon as practicable if the chatbot detects a credible threat of suicide or self-harm, must assess risks to children before launching a new or substantially changed chatbot, and must publish a child safety policy. Public prosecutors can seek civil penalties of up to $5,000 per affected child, or $15,000 if the violation was intentional, and a harmed child or their parent can sue for actual damages.
Who is protected: California minors using companion chatbots, and their parents or guardians
Legal detail
Cal. Stats. 2026, ch. 190 (SB 1119, Padilla; approved and filed Sept. 10, 2026). Amends Bus. & Prof. Code § 22602 and adds Chapter 11.6 (commencing with § 21810) to Division 8; § 21810: 'This chapter shall be known as "Adam's Law."' 'Child' = natural person under 18. Operators of companion chatbots must, beginning July 1, 2027 (§§ 21812, 21812.5, 21813 operative July 1, 2027), before making a new or substantially modified companion chatbot available in California, conduct and document a risk assessment of covered harms; publish a high-level child safety policy (§ 21812(c)); set default limits changeable only by a parent of one hour per continuous session and two hours per day for child users; maintain a crisis-response protocol with referral to an appropriate crisis service; and notify a parent as soon as practicable when a credible threat of suicide or self-harm is detected. The Attorney General must establish an incident-reporting mechanism by Jan. 1, 2028; child safety audits are required from Jan. 1, 2029 (or first public deployment, if later). § 21816: a public prosecutor (§ 17204) may recover civil penalties up to $5,000 per affected child for negligent and $15,000 per affected child for intentional violations, plus injunctive relief and fees; a child who suffers actual harm from a violation of § 21812(d)(1)-(5), or a parent/guardian on the child's behalf, may sue for actual damages, fees and injunctive or declaratory relief (financial harm must exceed $1,000 per child; emotional harm must be serious emotional distress). Companion measures signed the same day are indexed separately (California SB 867 AI chatbot toy moratorium (2026), California AB 1709 addictive feeds and under-16 age restriction (2026), California AB 2 social media child harm liability (2026), California AB 2071 digital wellness curriculum (2026), California AB 2298 cybersecurity curriculum (2026)).
Key facts
| Jurisdiction | California |
|---|---|
| Level | State |
| Strength | Stronger |
| Enacted | September 10, 2026 |
| Citation | Cal. S.B. 1119 (2025-2026 Reg. Sess.), Stats. 2026, ch. 190 — Adam's Law, Bus. & Prof. Code § 21810 et seq. (approved September 10, 2026; main duties operative July 1, 2027) |
| Private right of action | Yes, individuals can sue |
| Penalties | Civil penalties recoverable by a public prosecutor of up to $5,000 per affected child (negligent) or $15,000 per affected child (intentional), plus injunctive relief and attorney's fees; private action by a harmed child or parent for actual damages, fees and injunctive/declaratory relief (financial harm must exceed $1,000 per child; emotional harm must be serious emotional distress). |
| Topics | children's online safety · healthcare AI · consumer protection · automated decision-making · consumer data privacy |
| Bill text | California Legislative Information — SB 1119 (2025-2026), chaptered text (Stats. 2026, ch. 190) |
More AI rules in California
- CA EO N-6-26 (AI Workforce) · In effect
- California AB 489 (AI healthcare chatbot misrepresentation ban) · In effect
- X.AI v. Bonta (AB 2013 training-data disclosure) · Blocked / in litigation
- CA SB 1168 — data center grid cost allocation · Enacted (not yet in effect)
- California SB 867 AI chatbot toy moratorium (2026) · Enacted (not yet in effect)
- California AB 1709 addictive feeds and under-16 age restriction (2026) · Enacted (not yet in effect)
Related children's online safety rules elsewhere
- PA v. Character.AI (Fake Psychiatrist Chatbot) · Blocked / in litigation
- RI AI Companion Self-Harm Safety (2026) · Enacted (not yet in effect)
- Kids Internet and Digital Safety Act (KIDS Act) (H.R. 7757) · Proposed / pending
- Oregon SB 1546 (AI companion chatbot disclosure + private right of action) · Enacted (not yet in effect)
- xAI v. Harwood (Grok NCII Counter-Suit 2026) · Blocked / in litigation
- Blanchester OH schools AI policy EDEC (Jun. 29, 2026) · In effect
See something wrong or out of date? Submit a correction. Every entry must carry a verifiable source.