Blocked / in litigation
Unknown
Gagleard v. Perplexity AI, Inc. (3:26-cv-05949)
District Court, N.D. California · District Court, N.D. California — 3:26-cv-05949
Gagleard v. Perplexity AI, Inc. — 360 P.I.: Other
Technical detail
28:1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract · filed 2026-06-17
Who is protected: Case parties — see docket for full details.
Who must comply: Case parties — see docket for full details.
Key facts
| Jurisdiction | District Court, N.D. California |
|---|---|
| Level | Federal |
| Status | Blocked / in litigation |
| Protection strength | Unknown |
| Citation | District Court, N.D. California — 3:26-cv-05949 |
| Topics | automated decision-making |
| Last verified | 2026-06-25 |
| Official source | CourtListener docket — 3:26-cv-05949 ↗ |
Related automated decision-making rules elsewhere
- CA EO N-6-26 (AI Workforce) · In effect
- Arkansas public entity AI/ADS policy mandate (Act 848, 2025) · In effect
- Connecticut algorithmic rent ban — HB 8002 (eff. Jan 1, 2026) · In effect
- San Diego algorithmic rent price-fixing ban (Ord. O-21955, May 2025) · In effect
- Minneapolis algorithmic rent ban (Ord. 2025-010, eff. Mar 1, 2026) · In effect
- Seattle algorithmic rent-fixing ban (Ord. 127241 / SMC 7.34, July 2025) · In effect
See something wrong or out of date? Submit a correction — every entry must carry a verifiable official source.