Andersen v. Stability AI

Andersen v. Stability AI — Visual Artist Class Action over Stable Diffusion (N.D. Cal.)
N.D. Cal. · Andersen v. Stability AI Ltd., No. 3:23-cv-00201 (N.D. Cal.)

Status
Blocked / in litigation
Took effect
January 13, 2023
Applies to
Stability AI Ltd., Midjourney Inc., DeviantArt Inc., Runway AI Inc.

Visual artists Sarah Andersen, Kelly McKernan, and Karla Ortiz brought the first major image-generator class action, alleging Stability AI, Midjourney, DeviantArt, and Runway trained text-to-image models on artists' copyrighted works scraped from the web. After two rounds of motions to dismiss, key claims survived and the case is in discovery.

Who is protected: Visual artists whose works were scraped via the LAION dataset for image-generator training

Legal detail

Andersen v. Stability AI Ltd., No. 3:23-cv-00201 (N.D. Cal., filed Jan. 13, 2023; Judge William H. Orrick). Original complaint largely dismissed Oct. 30, 2023; First Amended Complaint substantially survived an Aug. 12, 2024 ruling: direct copyright infringement claims against Stability AI, Runway, Midjourney and DeviantArt survived; induced infringement and DMCA § 1202(b) claims survived against Stability; Lanham Act and unjust enrichment dismissed. Discovery ongoing 2025–2026.

Key facts

JurisdictionN.D. Cal.
LevelFederal
CitationAndersen v. Stability AI Ltd., No. 3:23-cv-00201 (N.D. Cal.)
Topicscopyright and training data
Court recordAndersen v. Stability AI — CourtListener 3:23-cv-00201

More AI rules in N.D. Cal.

Related copyright and training data rules elsewhere

See something wrong or out of date? Submit a correction. Every entry must carry a verifiable source.