Character.AI Companion Chatbot Suits

Garcia & Multi-Plaintiff Wrongful Death / Injury Suits v. Character.AI (M.D. Fla. + N.D. Tex.)
M.D. Fla. + E.D. Tex. · Garcia v. Character Techs., Inc., No. 6:24-cv-01903 (M.D. Fla.); A.F. v. Character Techs., Inc., No. 2:24-cv-01014 (E.D. Tex.)

Status
Blocked / in litigation
Took effect
October 22, 2024
Applies to
Character Technologies, Inc. and similarly situated chatbot platforms

Five plaintiffs across two jurisdictions sued Character.AI in 2024 alleging the companion chatbot service caused minors' suicide, self-harm, sexual abuse, and severe mental injury. Garcia v. Character.AI in Florida was the first AI companion wrongful-death suit; in Texas a federal court issued a landmark May 2025 ruling that AI chatbot outputs are not protected First Amendment speech.

Who is protected: Minor users (and bereaved families) harmed by companion AI chatbots

Legal detail

Garcia v. Character Technologies, Inc., No. 6:24-cv-01903 (M.D. Fla., filed Oct. 22, 2024; Judge Anne C. Conway); A.F. v. Character Technologies, Inc., No. 2:24-cv-01014 (E.D. Tex., filed Dec. 9, 2024; Judge J. Campbell Barker). Claims: products-liability, negligence, deceptive trade practices, wrongful death (Garcia). May 21, 2025: Judge Conway denied dismissal, holding chatbot outputs are not First-Amendment-protected speech of the developer and that Section 230 immunity does not categorically apply. Cases confidentially settled or in active discovery as of June 2026 (per Bloomberg Law Jan. 7, 2026).

Key facts

JurisdictionM.D. Fla. + E.D. Tex.
LevelFederal
CitationGarcia v. Character Techs., Inc., No. 6:24-cv-01903 (M.D. Fla.); A.F. v. Character Techs., Inc., No. 2:24-cv-01014 (E.D. Tex.)
Topicschildren's online safety · consumer protection · automated decision-making
Court recordGarcia v. Character.AI — CourtListener 6:24-cv-01903

Related children's online safety rules elsewhere

See something wrong or out of date? Submit a correction. Every entry must carry a verifiable source.