FTC v. Amazon (Ring) — $5.8M Settlement and Surveillance Restrictions
FTC · Federal Trade Commission v. Ring LLC, No. 1:23-cv-01549 (D.D.C. 2023)
The FTC settled with Amazon's Ring subsidiary for $5.8M in 2023 over privacy and security failures — including allowing employees and contractors to view customer videos without consent and failing to prevent stalkers from compromising accounts. The settlement restricts Ring's use of customer videos for product / AI development.
Technical detail
United States v. Amazon.com, Inc. (Ring), No. 1:23-cv-01549 (D.D.C., consent order July 31, 2023). $5.8M civil penalty; conduct relief: Ring must delete customer videos and face data unlawfully retained; implement comprehensive privacy and security program; limit employee/contractor access to videos; obtain explicit user consent before using videos to train algorithms.
Who is protected: Ring camera owners and individuals captured by Ring devices
Who must comply: Amazon.com, Inc. and Ring LLC
Key facts
| Jurisdiction | FTC |
|---|---|
| Level | Federal |
| Status | In effect |
| Protection strength | Moderate protection |
| Effective date | 2023-07-31 |
| Citation | Federal Trade Commission v. Ring LLC, No. 1:23-cv-01549 (D.D.C. 2023) |
| Topics | facial recognition · biometric data · consumer data privacy · consumer protection |
| Last verified | 2026-06-17 |
| Official source | FTC: Ring Employees Illegally Surveilled Customers — FTC press release ↗ |
More AI rules in FTC
- FTC v. Rite Aid · In effect
- FTC v. Amazon (Alexa) · In effect
- FTC v. NGL Labs · In effect
- FTC v. DoNotPay · In effect
- FTC v. Rytr · In effect
- FTC Operation AI Comply (Sept. 2024) · In effect
Related facial recognition rules elsewhere
- Virginia § 15.2-1723.2 (facial recognition by local law enforcement, eff. July 1, 2026) · In effect
- Ban biometric recognition in public accommodations (Ban The Scan) · Proposed / pending
- Limit facial recognition in residential buildings (Ban The Scan) · Proposed / pending
- Texas v. Google · In effect
- Lorenzano-Nunez v. Roestenberg — FR wrongful arrest (2026) · Blocked / in litigation
- Montgomery County MD Police Directive FC 0627 · In effect
See something wrong or out of date? Submit a correction — every entry must carry a verifiable official source.