Clayton OH 365-day data center moratorium (2026)
Clayton, Ohio — Immediate 365-Day Moratorium on Zoning, Conditional Use and Building Permit Applications for Data Processing Centers, Adopted Because the City Code Has No Definition for Them and They Could Otherwise Be Read as Warehouses (July 16, 2026)
Clayton, OH · City of Clayton, Ohio — resolution imposing a 365-day data center moratorium (adopted July 16, 2026)
- Status
- In effect
- Expires
- July 16, 2027
- Applies to
- Applicants seeking zoning, conditional use or building permits for data processing centers in Clayton during the 365-day moratorium
- Enforced by
- City of Clayton zoning administration / Clayton City Council
Clayton City Council passed a resolution at its July 16, 2026 meeting imposing an immediate 'temporary' moratorium of 365 days on the acceptance and processing of applications for zoning, conditional use and building permits for DATA PROCESSING CENTERS. The reason the city gave is the most useful part of the record. Clayton's codified ordinances contain NO SPECIFIC DEFINITION OR USE CLASSIFICATION for data processing centers — and City staff noted such facilities COULD BE INTERPRETED TO FALL WITHIN THE CITY'S EXISTING DEFINITION OF A WAREHOUSE-TYPE USE. That is a live hazard for any municipality with an older code: a hyperscale computing facility arriving as a permitted warehouse, approved administratively, with no opportunity for review. City Manager Elaine Wittman said the moratorium was a way to protect the city until its codified ordinances are updated, and added that she did not think Clayton had enough open land to accommodate a data center anyway. The public exchange is worth preserving too. Resident Deborah Retman, a thirty-year Piqua City Schools teacher, pressed council on the word 'temporary' and on transparency, citing what happened in nearby PIQUA: that city approved zoning for a massive data center WITHOUT INFORMING RESIDENTS it was making the zoning change, because of a NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT, and residents have since gone to court to halt the project. Wittman replied that the term is temporary because state-level rules remain up in the air, that it could be less than 365 days, that any extension would require returning to council, and that the city would advertise upcoming decisions.
Who is protected: Clayton, Ohio residents; the city's ability to review data center applications before its code defines the use
Legal detail
City of Clayton, Ohio (Montgomery County) — RESOLUTION adopted by City Council at its meeting of JULY 16, 2026, imposing an IMMEDIATE temporary moratorium of 365 DAYS on the ACCEPTANCE AND PROCESSING of applications for ZONING, CONDITIONAL USE, AND BUILDING PERMITS for DATA PROCESSING CENTERS. THE STATED LEGAL DEFECT DRIVING IT, and the transferable finding: the city's codified ordinances LACK A SPECIFIC DEFINITION OR USE CLASSIFICATION for data processing centers, and such facilities COULD BE INTERPRETED TO FALL WITHIN THE CITY'S EXISTING DEFINITION OF A WAREHOUSE-TYPE USE. A data center admitted as a warehouse is approved under standards written for storage \u2014 no power, water, noise, or generator review \u2014 and in many codes administratively rather than by council. Any municipality with a pre-2020 zoning code should assume this exposure exists unless it has checked. Compare Portage IN Technology Campus district data center rules (2026), which solved the same problem by creating a single permissible district, and Putnam County FL data center moratorium (2026), where commissioners adopted a DEFINITION before adopting the pause. TERM AND EXTENSION: City Manager Elaine Wittman stated the period 'could be 365 days or it could be less', that the city 'would have to come back to council' to extend, and that the temporary framing reflects that 'things with the state are still up in the air' \u2014 i.e. the same wait-for-the-state posture recorded on Ottawa IL data center moratorium extended to 2027. CAPACITY OBSERVATION: Wittman did not think the city had enough open land to accommodate a data center; the moratorium is protective rather than responsive to a pending project. THE PIQUA NDA PRECEDENT, raised by resident Deborah Retman at the meeting and recorded here because it is the concrete harm the transparency objection rests on: the CITY OF PIQUA approved zoning for a massive data center WITHOUT INFORMING RESIDENTS of the zoning change, DUE TO A NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT, and residents have taken legal action to halt the project. The Piqua site sits in a 1,168-acre heavy-industry area at the I-75 Exit 78 Business and Industrial Park, of which approximately 330 acres was reclassified from agriculture to heavy industrial in late January 2025. NEITHER THE PIQUA REZONING NOR THE RESIDENT LITIGATION IS INDEXED and both are leads. Pennsylvania has since banned data center NDAs outright (Pennsylvania EO 2026-05 data center restrictions (2026)).
Key facts
| Jurisdiction | Clayton, OH |
|---|---|
| Level | City / local |
| Strength | Moderate |
| Enacted | July 16, 2026 |
| Citation | City of Clayton, Ohio — resolution imposing a 365-day data center moratorium (adopted July 16, 2026) |
| Private right of action | No, agency enforcement only |
| Penalties | No covered application may be accepted or processed during the moratorium |
| Topics | data-center siting and energy · consumer protection · government use of AI · AI disclosure and transparency |
| News report | Clayton enacts data center moratorium — Register-Herald |
Related data-center siting and energy rules elsewhere
- Superior WI Data Center Moratorium (1-year) · In effect
- Dane County WI Hyperscale Data Center Moratorium · In effect
- Madison WI Data Center Moratorium (1-year) · In effect
- Manitowoc County WI Data Center Moratorium · In effect
- WA SB 5982 (Data Center / Clean Energy) · In effect
- Dayton OH data center moratorium (180-day, Apr 2026) · In effect
See something wrong or out of date? Submit a correction. Every entry must carry a verifiable source.