Tennessee — Enterprise Artificial Intelligence Policy (200-POL-007)
Tennessee · Enterprise Artificial Intelligence Policy (200-POL-007)
Tennessee's Department of Finance and Administration (Strategic Technology Solutions) sets minimum requirements for valid, reliable, transparent, and ethical use of AI across state departments, requiring monitoring of AI design, deployment, and procurement to minimize negative impacts.
Technical detail
Tennessee's Department of Finance and Administration (Strategic Technology Solutions) sets minimum requirements for valid, reliable, transparent, and ethical use of AI across state departments, requiring monitoring of AI design, deployment, and procurement to minimize negative impacts.
Who is protected: Residents interacting with state government AI systems; public-sector data subjects.
Who must comply: All Tennessee state departments and agencies developing, procuring, or deploying AI systems
Key facts
| Jurisdiction | Tennessee |
|---|---|
| Level | State |
| Status | In effect |
| Protection strength | Limited protection |
| Effective date | 2024-01-01 |
| Citation | Enterprise Artificial Intelligence Policy (200-POL-007) |
| Topics | government use of AI · AI disclosure and transparency · automated decision-making |
| Last verified | 2026-07-01 |
| Official source | Enterprise Artificial Intelligence Policy 200-POL-007 | TN Department of Finance and Administration ↗ |
More AI rules in Tennessee
- TN SB 151 (2017 AV Act) · In effect
- TN drone trespass / FFUSA · In effect
- Tennessee HB 2163 (AI-generated child abuse images are illegal 'material') · In effect
- Tennessee Information Protection Act (opt out of automated profiling decisions) · In effect
- Tennessee SB 837 (AI is not a 'person' under TN law) · In effect
- Tennessee SB 1580 (AI can't claim to be a mental health professional) · In effect
Related government use of AI rules elsewhere
- CA EO N-6-26 (AI Workforce) · In effect
- WA SB 5982 (Data Center / Clean Energy) · In effect
- Arkansas public entity AI/ADS policy mandate (Act 848, 2025) · In effect
- One-year moratorium on data center development (Inver Grove Heights MN) · In effect
- FERC order directing PJM and other grid operators to reform · Enacted (not yet in effect)
- San Marcos citywide data center ban (Land Use Matrix amendme · In effect
See something wrong or out of date? Submit a correction — every entry must carry a verifiable official source.