U.S. Senate (Traveler Privacy Protection Act of 2025, S.1691) — Traveler Privacy Protection Act of 2025 (S.1691)
United States · Traveler Privacy Protection Act of 2025 (S.1691)
This pending bipartisan Senate bill would guarantee travelers the right to opt out of TSA facial recognition at airports, bar worse treatment for opting out, and limit retention and secondary use of face data.
Technical detail
This pending bipartisan Senate bill would guarantee travelers the right to opt out of TSA facial recognition at airports, bar worse treatment for opting out, and limit retention and secondary use of face data.
Who is protected: People subject to this body's AI/surveillance systems.
Who must comply: U.S. Senate (Traveler Privacy Protection Act of 2025, S.1691)
Key facts
| Jurisdiction | United States |
|---|---|
| Level | Federal |
| Status | Proposed / pending |
| Protection strength | Limited protection |
| Citation | Traveler Privacy Protection Act of 2025 (S.1691) |
| Topics | facial recognition · biometric data · consumer data privacy · government use of AI · AI disclosure and transparency |
| Last verified | 2026-07-01 |
| Official source | S.1691 Traveler Privacy Protection Act of 2025 (Congress.gov) ↗ |
More AI rules in United States
- Trump AI Innovation & Security EO (June 2026) · In effect
- FERC order directing PJM and other grid operators to reform · Enacted (not yet in effect)
- Chatrie v. United States (Fourth Amendment protection for lo · Blocked / in litigation
- Kids Internet and Digital Safety Act (KIDS Act) (H.R. 7757) · Proposed / pending
- NAIC AI Evaluation Tool Pilot (12 states, 2026) · Proposed / pending
- FTC Proposed Policy Statement — AI Accuracy (July 2026) · Proposed / pending
Related facial recognition rules elsewhere
- Virginia § 15.2-1723.2 (facial recognition by local law enforcement, eff. July 1, 2026) · In effect
- Ban biometric recognition in public accommodations (Ban The Scan) · Proposed / pending
- Limit facial recognition in residential buildings (Ban The Scan) · Proposed / pending
- Texas v. Google · In effect
- Lorenzano-Nunez v. Roestenberg — FR wrongful arrest (2026) · Blocked / in litigation
- Montgomery County MD Police Directive FC 0627 · In effect
See something wrong or out of date? Submit a correction — every entry must carry a verifiable official source.