Utah SB 149 — Artificial Intelligence Policy Act (SUPERSEDED)
UT · Utah SB 149 (2024) — substantially superseded by SB 226/SB 332 (2025)
Utah SB 149 was the first-in-nation generative AI disclosure statute (2024), establishing a regulatory sandbox and consumer disclosure requirements. Substantially rewritten and narrowed by SB 226 and SB 332 in 2025.
Technical detail
SB 149 (2024) — required regulated occupations to disclose GenAI use to consumers in 'high-risk' interactions; created the AI Learning Lab regulatory sandbox; granted AG enforcement under UCSPA. Largely supplanted by 2025 SB 226 (narrower disclosure) and SB 332 (sandbox refinements).
Who is protected: Utahns interacting with regulated occupations using GenAI
Who must comply: Regulated-occupation licensees (was)
Key facts
| Jurisdiction | UT |
|---|---|
| Level | State |
| Status | Repealed / replaced |
| Protection strength | Unknown |
| Effective date | 2024-05-01 |
| Enacted | 2024-03-13 |
| Citation | Utah SB 149 (2024) — substantially superseded by SB 226/SB 332 (2025) |
| Enforced by | Utah Division of Consumer Protection |
| Private right of action | No — agency enforcement only |
| Penalties | Civil penalties under UCSPA |
| Topics | consumer protection · AI disclosure and transparency |
| Last verified | 2026-06-16 |
| Official source | SB 149 — Utah State Legislature ↗ |
More AI rules in UT
- UT AI Policy Act (SB 149) · In effect
Related consumer protection rules elsewhere
- Missouri AI Therapy Chatbot Ban (SB 1019) · Enacted (not yet in effect)
- Vermont Data Broker Law (H.211) · Enacted (not yet in effect)
- Arkansas Frank Broyles Act AI amendment — voice and likeness protection (2025) · In effect
- PA v. Character.AI (Fake Psychiatrist Chatbot) · Blocked / in litigation
- NAACP v. xAI (Colossus 2 Air Pollution) · Blocked / in litigation
- RI Therapy Chatbot Ban (2026) · In effect
See something wrong or out of date? Submit a correction — every entry must carry a verifiable official source.