AI Laws in Marshalltown, Iowa

AI Laws USA tracks 19 AI rules that apply to people and businesses in Marshalltown, Iowa: 10+ federal rules, 8 Iowa state-level rules, and 1 local Marshalltown ordinance. Coverage is strongest on automated decision-making, consumer protection, consumer data privacy, and healthcare AI. 7 of these rules are already in effect. Each entry below links to its official source.

Marshalltown local AI rules (and Marshall County)

1 local AI rule specific to Marshalltown, Iowa or Marshall County.

  1. In effect Strength: moderate

    Marshalltown IA 4-month data center moratorium

    Marshalltown, IA · Effective August 28, 2026 · City of Marshalltown, IA, 4-Month Data Center Construction Moratorium (all readings passed; legally effective August 28, 2026; expires November 23, 2026)

    The Marshalltown, Iowa City Council enacted a four-month moratorium on data center construction within city limits after a months-long deliberation. The council initially voted the moratorium down in June 2026, then reversed course on July 13, 2026. After all three required ordinance readings were completed by late August, the moratorium legally took effect August 28, 2026 and expires November 23, 2026. A 60-day extension provision is available if the council needs more time. Marshalltown has no data-center-specific zoning regulations; data centers currently fall under the 'major utilities' land-use category. Marshalltown is the county seat of Marshall County in central Iowa.

    View full entry · News report

Iowa-level AI rules

8 Iowa state rules apply to residents and businesses in Marshalltown. Sorted strongest first.

  1. In effect Strength: limited

    IA DOI AI Bulletin

    IA · Effective November 7, 2024 · Iowa Insurance Division Bulletin 24-04 (2024-11-07)

    The IA Department of Insurance adopted the NAIC Model Bulletin on Use of Artificial Intelligence Systems by Insurers. Insurers licensed in IA must maintain a written AI program with governance, risk-management, testing, third-party-AI oversight, and documentation controls. The bulletin operationalizes existing unfair-trade-practice and unfair-discrimination law as applied to insurers' AI use cases — underwriting, pricing, claims, fraud detection, and marketing.

    View full entry · Agency page

  2. Enacted (not yet in effect) Strength: moderate

    Iowa HF 2635 (no AI-only prior-auth denials)

    Iowa · Effective January 1, 2027 · Iowa H.F. 2635, 91st Gen. Assemb. (2026), Sec. 514F.8(2A), eff. Jan. 1, 2027

    Iowa lets a utilization review organization use an AI-based algorithm or system to conduct an initial review of a prior-authorization request, but forbids relying on AI as the sole basis to deny, delay, or downgrade a medical-necessity prior-authorization request. A qualified human reviewer — a clinical peer or qualified reviewer — must make the binding determination.

    View full entry · Bill text

  3. In effect Strength: limited

    Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Policy (ENTERPRISE P

    Iowa · Effective March 31, 2025 · Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Policy (ENTERPRISE PY-AI)

    Iowa's enterprise generative-AI policy, issued under Iowa Administrative Code 129-8.4(8B), sets minimum requirements and prohibited uses for generative AI, mandating human review of AI outputs and disclosure of AI-generated code.

    View full entry · Agency page

  4. In effect Strength: limited

    Iowa Consumer Data Protection Act

    Iowa · Effective January 1, 2025 · Iowa SF 262 (2023), Iowa Code ch. 715D

    Iowa's privacy law gives consumers rights to access, delete, copy, and opt out of the sale of their personal data and targeted advertising. Notably it does NOT include a profiling opt-out, making it one of the more business-friendly state privacy laws.

    View full entry · Bill text

  5. Enacted (not yet in effect) Strength: limited

    Iowa SF 2417 (Conversational AI Safety Act)

    Iowa · Effective July 1, 2027 · Iowa S.F. 2417, 91st Gen. Assemb. (2026), applies July 1, 2027

    Iowa requires operators of conversational AI services to clearly disclose that a user is interacting with artificial intelligence — through a persistent disclaimer or a notice repeated at least every three hours of continuous use — whenever a reasonable person might otherwise believe they are talking to a human. Operators must adopt protocols to respond to user messages about suicidal ideation or self-harm, including referring the user to crisis resources, and may not represent that the service provides professional psychological or behavioral health care, with extra safeguards for minors.

    View full entry · Bill text

  6. In effect Strength: limited

    Attorney General Brenna Bird Warns of Deepfake Dangers as St

    Iowa · Effective August 19, 2025 · Attorney General Brenna Bird Warns of Deepfake Dangers as Students Head Back to School

    The Iowa Attorney General issued a consumer alert warning parents and schools that AI-generated deepfake images used to harass or bully students are criminal acts under state and federal law.

    View full entry · Agency page

  7. In effect Strength: limited

    Iowa Synthetic Intimate Content Law

    Iowa · Effective July 1, 2024 · Iowa HF 2240 (2024)

    Iowa criminalizes generating or distributing synthetic images or videos depicting a person in sexual acts or nudity without consent. Violations involving adults are aggravated misdemeanors; involving minors, felonies. Expressly motivated by AI-generated pornographic deepfakes.

    View full entry · Bill text

  8. In effect Strength: limited

    Iowa AI CSAM Law

    Iowa · Effective July 1, 2024 · Iowa SF 2243 (2024), amending Iowa Code § 728

    Iowa amended its sexual-exploitation-of-a-minor law to explicitly include depictions 'created, adapted, or modified' by AI to appear to show an identifiable minor in a prohibited act. First offense: Class D felony (up to 5 years); second: Class C felony (up to 10 years). Passed unanimously.

    View full entry · Bill text

Full Iowa jurisdiction page

Federal AI rules that apply in Marshalltown, Iowa

These federal rules apply everywhere in the United States, including Marshalltown, Iowa. Showing the 10 strongest and most recent.

  1. In effect Strength: stronger

    TVA data center capacity commitment charge (2026)

    Tennessee Valley Authority · Effective October 1, 2026 · Tenn. Valley Auth. Bd. of Dirs. — Data Center Capacity Commitment Charge (approved Aug. 20, 2026; eff. Oct. 1, 2026)

    The Tennessee Valley Authority's Board of Directors approved a separate, higher wholesale rate for data centers on August 20, 2026, effective October 1. New or expanding data center loads above 5 megawatts now fall under a Capacity Commitment Charge attached to TVA's data center rate schedules, designed to recover the incremental capacity costs those customers impose on the system. The headline figures are substantial: upfront capacity commitment charges of roughly $1.5 million per megawatt, payable over three to five years, and an all-in average billing increase for data center customers of about 10%, phased in across three consecutive fiscal years. The stated purpose is to keep residential rates low while still serving growing data center demand. TVA matters here out of proportion to a single utility. It is a federal corporate agency supplying power across seven states, so this is not a state rate case but a regional cost-allocation decision reaching a large share of the Southeast — and TVA is among the first large US utilities to adopt a tariff aimed specifically at AI-driven load. Where most 2026 measures in this dataset restrict where data centers may be built, this one changes what they pay to run.

    View full entry · News report

  2. In effect Strength: stronger

    Bartz v. Anthropic

    N.D. Cal. · Effective September 5, 2025 · Bartz v. Anthropic PBC, No. 3:24-cv-05417 (N.D. Cal.)

    Authors Andrea Bartz, Charles Graeber, and Kirk Wallace Johnson sued Anthropic over its use of pirated-book datasets to train Claude. In June 2025 Judge William Alsup ruled that training on lawfully purchased books was fair use. The piracy claims (LibGen ingestion) proceeded toward settlement; in September 2025 Anthropic agreed to a $1.5 billion class settlement covering ~500,000 works. Judge Alsup granted preliminary approval September 25, 2025 and final approval July 20, 2026. The appeal period runs through August 19, 2026; class members will not receive payments until at least end of 2026.

    View full entry · Court record

  3. In effect Strength: stronger

    COPPA + 2025 Rule (childrens data)

    United States · Effective June 23, 2025 · 15 U.S.C. §§ 6501–6506; 16 C.F.R. Part 312

    COPPA requires online services aimed at children under 13 to get verifiable parental consent before collecting kids' personal data. The 2025 rule update — fully in effect since April 22, 2026 — adds biometric identifiers (like face templates and voiceprints, which matter for AI tools), requires separate parental consent before sharing children's data for targeted advertising, and tightens data retention limits.

    View full entry · Agency page

  4. In effect Strength: stronger

    TAKE IT DOWN Act

    United States · Effective May 19, 2025 · Pub. L. No. 119-12 (S. 146)

    Makes it a federal crime to knowingly publish intimate images of someone without consent, including AI-generated deepfakes. Social media and similar platforms must give victims a way to request removal and must take the content (and known copies) down within 48 hours. The platform removal requirement became enforceable May 19, 2026, and the FTC has already begun enforcement.

    View full entry · Agency page

  5. Blocked / in litigation

    NetChoice v. Yost (Ohio)

    S.D. Ohio · Effective April 16, 2025 · NetChoice, LLC v. Yost, No. 2:24-cv-00047 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 16, 2025)

    Ohio's Social Media Parental Notification Act — requiring parental consent for minors' social-media use, including algorithmic feeds — was preliminarily enjoined on February 12, 2024, then permanently enjoined on April 16, 2025 when the district court granted summary judgment for NetChoice. The state appealed to the Sixth Circuit, which vacated the district court's injunction in 2026.

    View full entry · Court record

  6. In effect Strength: stronger

    Thaler v. Perlmutter (Copyright)

    D.C. Cir. · Effective March 18, 2025 · Thaler v. Perlmutter, 130 F.4th 1039 (D.C. Cir. 2025)

    The companion copyright case: Stephen Thaler sought to register a copyright with 'Creativity Machine' (his AI) as the author. The D.C. Circuit affirmed in March 2025 that the Copyright Act's human-authorship requirement is dispositive as a matter of statutory law. AI cannot be a copyright author under U.S. law.

    View full entry · Court record

  7. In effect Strength: stronger

    Louis v. SafeRent

    D. Mass. · Effective November 20, 2024 · Louis v. SafeRent Solutions, LLC, No. 1:22-cv-10800 (D. Mass.)

    SafeRent agreed in November 2024 to a $2.275M settlement and a five-year ban on using its 'SafeRent Score' for housing-voucher applicants, after a class action alleged its AI tenant-screening tool systematically denied housing to Black and Hispanic Section 8 voucher holders. The first major AI tenant-screening Fair Housing Act settlement.

    View full entry · Court record

  8. In effect Strength: stronger

    FTC Impersonation Rule (AI)

    United States · Effective April 1, 2024 · 16 C.F.R. Part 461; 89 Fed. Reg. 15017

    The FTC's Impersonation Rule lets the agency directly sue scammers who pretend to be a government agency or a real business — including those who use AI-cloned voices or generated images to do so. Civil penalties can reach $53,088 per violation. The FTC also issued a supplemental notice in February 2024 proposing to extend the rule to all individual impersonation.

    View full entry · Agency page

  9. In effect Strength: stronger

    FTC v. Rite Aid

    FTC · Effective February 26, 2024 · FTC v. Rite Aid Corp., No. 2:23-cv-05023 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 19, 2023)

    The FTC banned Rite Aid from using facial-recognition technology in its stores for five years after finding the pharmacy chain's FRT system falsely tagged customers — disproportionately women and people of color — as shoplifters, leading to wrongful detentions and humiliations.

    View full entry · Agency page

  10. In effect Strength: stronger

    TCPA (AI voice calls)

    United States · Effective February 8, 2024 · 47 U.S.C. § 227; FCC 24-17

    Robocalls using AI-cloned or AI-generated voices are treated like other 'artificial voice' calls: callers need your prior express consent, must identify themselves, and must offer opt-outs for telemarketing. You can personally sue violators for $500 to $1,500 per illegal call.

    View full entry · Agency page

See all federal AI rules

Frequently asked questions about AI laws in Marshalltown, Iowa

Are there AI laws in Marshalltown, Iowa?
Yes. We index 1 local AI rule that specifically apply in Marshalltown, Iowa, including Marshalltown IA 4-month data center moratorium. On top of that, 8 Iowa state-level rules and 10+ federal AI rules apply throughout the city.
What federal AI rules apply in Marshalltown?
Every federal AI rule in our index applies in Marshalltown, Iowa. The highest-strength federal rules currently include TVA data center capacity commitment charge (2026), Bartz v. Anthropic, COPPA + 2025 Rule (childrens data). 10+ federal entries are tracked in total.
Does Iowa have an AI privacy law?
Iowa has 5 privacy- or automated-decision-related AI rules in our index, including Iowa HF 2635 (no AI-only prior-auth denials) and IA DOI AI Bulletin. These apply to residents of Marshalltown.
Are deepfakes illegal in Iowa?
Iowa has 2 deepfake- or AI-image-related laws in our index, including Iowa Synthetic Intimate Content Law and Iowa AI CSAM Law. Additionally, the federal TAKE IT DOWN Act covers non-consensual intimate-image deepfakes nationwide.
Can my employer use AI to screen me for jobs in Marshalltown?
Marshalltown, Iowa has no AI-employment-screening-specific rule in our index. Federal Title VII, ADA, and EEOC guidance still apply, plus any general Iowa anti-discrimination statutes.
How do I report an AI law violation in Marshalltown?
Most AI rules are enforced by an agency listed on each individual entry. For Iowa state laws, the Iowa Attorney General's office is the usual starting point. For federal AI rules, file complaints with the relevant federal agency (FTC, EEOC, HUD, CFPB, etc.) named on each entry. We also accept tips at feedback@ailawsusa.com.
Are facial recognition cameras allowed in Marshalltown?
Marshalltown, Iowa has no facial-recognition-specific rule in our index. Use by private businesses is largely unregulated, while government use is governed by general Fourth Amendment and Iowa law.
Is Marshalltown regulated by Iowa's consumer privacy act?
Yes. Iowa state laws apply uniformly to residents and businesses operating in Marshalltown. See the Iowa jurisdiction page for the complete list of consumer-protection and privacy rules.

Have we missed an AI rule in Marshalltown?

This page is generated from our open civic dataset. If you know of a Marshalltown ordinance, county rule, or local enforcement action we should add, email feedback@ailawsusa.com or submit a correction. Every entry must include a verifiable source.