Bartz v. Anthropic

Bartz v. Anthropic — Author Class Action and $1.5B Settlement (N.D. Cal.)
N.D. Cal. · Bartz v. Anthropic PBC, No. 3:24-cv-05417 (N.D. Cal.)

Status
In effect
Took effect
September 5, 2025
Applies to
Anthropic PBC

Authors Andrea Bartz, Charles Graeber, and Kirk Wallace Johnson sued Anthropic over its use of pirated-book datasets to train Claude. In June 2025 Judge William Alsup ruled that training on lawfully purchased books was fair use. The piracy claims (LibGen ingestion) proceeded toward settlement; in September 2025 Anthropic agreed to a $1.5 billion class settlement covering ~500,000 works. Judge Alsup granted preliminary approval September 25, 2025 and final approval July 20, 2026. The appeal period runs through August 19, 2026; class members will not receive payments until at least end of 2026.

Who is protected: Class of authors whose works appeared in LibGen / PiLiMi / Books3 corpora used by Anthropic

Legal detail

Bartz v. Anthropic PBC, No. 3:24-cv-05417 (N.D. Cal., filed Aug. 19, 2024; Judge William H. Alsup). June 23, 2025 Order: training Claude on lawfully purchased books constituted transformative fair use; downloading pirated copies from Library Genesis and Pirate Library Mirror was not fair use and constituted infringement. Sept. 5, 2025: parties announced $1.5B class settlement covering ~500,000 works; preliminary approval Sept. 25, 2025; final approval and judgment July 20, 2026 (ECF 680, Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin); fee-allocation appeals filed Aug. 18–19, 2026 (9th Cir. Nos. 26-5391, 26-5455); objector notice Aug. 31, 2026; payments expected end of 2026 at earliest.

Key facts

JurisdictionN.D. Cal.
LevelFederal
StrengthStronger
CitationBartz v. Anthropic PBC, No. 3:24-cv-05417 (N.D. Cal.)
Topicscopyright and training data
Court recordBartz v. Anthropic — CourtListener 3:24-cv-05417

More AI rules in N.D. Cal.

Related copyright and training data rules elsewhere

See something wrong or out of date? Submit a correction. Every entry must carry a verifiable source.