HomeLegal DirectoryBartz v. Anthropic

In effect Stronger protection

Bartz v. Anthropic — Author Class Action and $1.5B Settlement (N.D. Cal.)

N.D. Cal. · Bartz v. Anthropic PBC, No. 3:24-cv-05417 (N.D. Cal.)

Authors Andrea Bartz, Charles Graeber, and Kirk Wallace Johnson sued Anthropic over its use of pirated-book datasets to train Claude. In June 2025 Judge William Alsup ruled that training on lawfully purchased books was fair use. The piracy claims (LibGen ingestion) proceeded toward settlement; in September 2025 Anthropic agreed to a $1.5 billion class settlement covering ~500,000 works. Judge Alsup granted preliminary approval September 25, 2025 and final approval July 20, 2026. The appeal period runs through August 19, 2026; class members will not receive payments until at least end of 2026.

Technical detail

Bartz v. Anthropic PBC, No. 3:24-cv-05417 (N.D. Cal., filed Aug. 19, 2024; Judge William H. Alsup). June 23, 2025 Order: training Claude on lawfully purchased books constituted transformative fair use; downloading pirated copies from Library Genesis and Pirate Library Mirror was not fair use and constituted infringement. Sept. 5, 2025: parties announced $1.5B class settlement covering ~500,000 works; preliminary approval Sept. 25, 2025; final approval granted July 20, 2026. Appeal period ends August 19, 2026; payments expected end of 2026 at earliest.

Who is protected: Class of authors whose works appeared in LibGen / PiLiMi / Books3 corpora used by Anthropic

Who must comply: Anthropic PBC

Key facts

JurisdictionN.D. Cal.
LevelFederal
StatusIn effect
Protection strengthStronger protection
Effective date2025-09-05
CitationBartz v. Anthropic PBC, No. 3:24-cv-05417 (N.D. Cal.)
Topicscopyright and training data
Last verified2026-08-09
Official sourceBartz v. Anthropic — CourtListener 3:24-cv-05417 ↗

More AI rules in N.D. Cal.

Related copyright and training data rules elsewhere

See something wrong or out of date? Submit a correction — every entry must carry a verifiable official source.