California AB 1405 AI auditor registry (2026)
California — AB 1405: State Registry of AI Auditors with Independence, Transparency and Integrity Standards (Signed September 9, 2026)
California · Cal. A.B. 1405, Ch. 178, Stats. 2026 (approved Sept. 9, 2026)
- Status
- Enacted (not yet in effect)
- Takes effect
- January 1, 2027
- Applies to
- Organizations and individuals seeking to act as AI auditors in California, who must register and meet the independence standards; developers and deployers procuring audits.
- Enforced by
- State of California registering agency (not established from available coverage)
California Assembly Bill 1405 creates a state registry for AI auditors and sets standards for their independence, transparency and integrity. Governor Newsom signed it on September 9, 2026, the same day he signed Senate Bill 813, which sets up a framework for independent organizations to assess AI systems. The law takes effect January 1, 2027, and the Government Operations Agency must have the registry running by January 1, 2029, after which AI auditors must be registered. Registered auditors must be independent of the companies they audit, may not audit their own work or seek jobs with the company during an audit, and may not block or punish employee whistleblowers. An auditor who breaks the rules can be removed from the registry and referred to the Attorney General. Assemblymember Rebecca Bauer-Kahan authored the bill.
Who is protected: Californians relying on AI compliance assessments, through auditor independence, transparency and integrity requirements that guard against assessments captured by the parties being assessed.
Legal detail
California Assembly Bill 1405 (2026), authored by Assemblymember Rebecca Bauer-Kahan, approved by Gov. Gavin Newsom September 9, 2026 (Ch. 178, Stats. 2026); adds Chapter 5.9.5 (commencing with Section 11549.80) to the Government Code. Statute effective January 1, 2027; the Government Operations Agency must establish the AI auditor registry, and the prohibition on unregistered AI auditing commences, January 1, 2029. Registrants supply business name and contact information, applicable California laws, certifications, a service description and standard operating procedures referencing industry standards, and pay annual fees (capped at reasonable administrative cost) into the AI Auditors' Registration Fund. Independence standards: registered auditors must be independent of the auditee, may not evaluate their own work, may not seek employment with the auditee during an audit, must possess the necessary expertise, and may not prevent employee whistleblowing or retaliate against employees. CPA firms licensed by the California Board of Accountancy performing attestation engagements comply through existing professional standards. Enforcement: violations are grounds for removal from the registry and referral to the Attorney General or other enforcement authorities, after written notice and an opportunity to cure. Companion to SB 813 (McNerney; Ch. 179, Stats. 2026), which establishes the framework for independent verification organizations to assess AI systems and models. RECONCILIATION: duplicate legiscan-ca-ab1405 removed.
Key facts
| Jurisdiction | California |
|---|---|
| Level | State |
| Strength | Stronger |
| Enacted | September 9, 2026 |
| Citation | Cal. A.B. 1405, Ch. 178, Stats. 2026 (approved Sept. 9, 2026) |
| Private right of action | No, agency enforcement only |
| Penalties | Violations are grounds for removal from the registry and referral to the Attorney General or other enforcement authorities, after written notice and an opportunity to cure. |
| Topics | automated decision-making · AI disclosure and transparency · AI hiring and employment · consumer protection |
| Bill text | CA California AB 1405 AI auditor registry (2026) — official record (leginfo.legislature.ca.gov) |
More AI rules in California
- CA EO N-6-26 (AI Workforce) · In effect
- California AB 489 (AI healthcare chatbot misrepresentation ban) · In effect
- X.AI v. Bonta (AB 2013 training-data disclosure) · Blocked / in litigation
- CA SB 1168 — data center grid cost allocation · Enacted (not yet in effect)
- California SB 1119 Adam's Law, companion chatbots (2026) · Enacted (not yet in effect)
- California SB 867 AI chatbot toy moratorium (2026) · Enacted (not yet in effect)
Related automated decision-making rules elsewhere
- Arkansas public entity AI/ADS policy mandate (Act 848, 2025) · In effect
- Connecticut algorithmic rent ban — HB 8002 (eff. Jan 1, 2026) · In effect
- San Diego algorithmic rent price-fixing ban (Ord. O-21955, May 2025) · In effect
- Minneapolis algorithmic rent ban (Ord. 2025-010, eff. Mar 1, 2026) · In effect
- Seattle algorithmic rent-fixing ban (Ord. 127241 / SMC 7.34, July 2025) · In effect
- Trump AI Innovation & Security EO (June 2026) · In effect
See something wrong or out of date? Submit a correction. Every entry must carry a verifiable source.