West Hollywood CA Flock safeguards direction (3-2, Jul. 20, 2026)
West Hollywood, CA — Council Votes 3-2 to Keep Flock Safety ALPRs and Directs City Manager to Negotiate Contract Safeguards (No Federal/ICE Sharing Without Court Mandate, 30-Day Deletion, $200,000 Penalty per Unauthorized Share) (July 20, 2026)
West Hollywood, CA · West Hollywood City Council, July 20, 2026, item E.4 (3-2 vote directing negotiation of Flock Safety contract amendments)
- Status
- Proposed / pending
- Applies to
- Flock Safety (as city contractor, once amended); City of West Hollywood
- Enforced by
- City of West Hollywood (City Manager; Public Safety Department)
West Hollywood's City Council voted 3-2 on July 20, 2026 to keep the city's Flock Safety license plate reader cameras, but only if the contract is changed to add new protections. The city manager was told to negotiate amendments that would bar sharing camera data with ICE or other federal agencies unless a court requires it, delete data after 30 days unless the city or a court needs it kept, charge Flock $200,000 for each unauthorized share, require monthly program reviews, require quick notice to the city when Flock gets a legal demand for data, and set out termination rights. These safeguards take effect only once the amended contract is signed, which had not been confirmed as of October 10, 2026.
Who is protected: Drivers and residents captured by West Hollywood's Flock ALPR cameras, particularly with respect to federal immigration-enforcement access to plate data
Legal detail
West Hollywood City Council, regular meeting July 20, 2026, item E.4. Motion carried 3-2 (Heilman, Hang, Meister aye; Byers, Erickson no). INSTRUMENT: direction to staff, not an ordinance or resolution; City Manager to negotiate amendments to the existing Flock Safety service agreement. DIRECTED TERMS: (1) no sharing of city ALPR data with ICE/federal agencies unless mandated by courts; (2) 30-day deletion unless preservation required by the city or courts; (3) $200,000 penalty per unauthorized sharing; (4) monthly program reviews; (5) prompt notification to the city of legal data requests received by Flock; (6) termination rights and compensation liabilities. Context: city safety director Danny Rivas said existing city policy already prohibits city contractors from assisting federal immigration enforcement with city-owned ALPR data except when legally required. STATUS 'proposed' because the protections depend on a contract amendment not yet confirmed executed.
Key facts
| Jurisdiction | West Hollywood, CA |
|---|---|
| Level | City / local |
| Citation | West Hollywood City Council, July 20, 2026, item E.4 (3-2 vote directing negotiation of Flock Safety contract amendments) |
| Private right of action | No, agency enforcement only |
| Penalties | $200,000 per unauthorized data-sharing incident (proposed contract term) |
| Topics | consumer data privacy · police and surveillance AI · data retention · government use of AI |
| News report | WeHo keeps Flock cameras, with new safeguards — Beverly Press & Park Labrea News (Alfredo Santana, July 22, 2026) |
Related consumer data privacy rules elsewhere
- Vermont Data Broker Law (H.211) · Enacted (not yet in effect)
- Chatrie v. United States (Fourth Amendment protection for location… · Blocked / in litigation
- House Bill 2512 — Banning surveillance pricing by rideshare companies · Proposed / pending
- Kids Internet and Digital Safety Act (KIDS Act) (H.R. 7757) · Proposed / pending
- Maine LD 61 (employer surveillance disclosure & prohibition) · In effect
- Washington SHB 1672 (employee monitoring notice, ADS restrictions, emotion AI ban) · In effect
See something wrong or out of date? Submit a correction. Every entry must carry a verifiable source.