Patel v. Facebook (BIPA)

Patel v. Facebook — $650M BIPA Settlement over Tag Suggestions (N.D. Cal.)
N.D. Cal. · In re Facebook Biometric Info. Privacy Litig., No. 3:15-cv-03747 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2021); 932 F.3d 1264 (9th Cir. 2019)

Status
In effect
Took effect
February 26, 2021
Applies to
Meta Platforms, Inc. (formerly Facebook, Inc.)

The largest biometric-privacy settlement in U.S. history at the time — $650 million paid by Facebook to roughly 1.6 million Illinois users whose facial templates were extracted by the 'Tag Suggestions' feature without BIPA consent. Each class member received about $400.

Who is protected: Illinois users whose face geometry was extracted by Facebook between June 7, 2011 and Aug. 19, 2020

Legal detail

In re Facebook Biometric Information Privacy Litigation (Patel v. Facebook, Inc.), No. 3:15-cv-03747 (N.D. Cal., filed May 14, 2015; Judge James Donato). Final approval Feb. 26, 2021: $650M common fund (increased from initial $550M); 1.6M class members, ~$397/claimant. Ninth Circuit affirmed class certification in 2019 (Patel v. Facebook, 932 F.3d 1264). Foundational ruling that BIPA's intangible-harm violation satisfies Article III standing.

Key facts

JurisdictionN.D. Cal.
LevelFederal
StrengthStronger
CitationIn re Facebook Biometric Info. Privacy Litig., No. 3:15-cv-03747 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2021); 932 F.3d 1264 (9th Cir. 2019)
Topicsbiometric data · consumer data privacy · facial recognition
Court recordIn re Facebook BIPA Litigation — CourtListener 3:15-cv-03747

More AI rules in N.D. Cal.

Related biometric data rules elsewhere

See something wrong or out of date? Submit a correction. Every entry must carry a verifiable source.