Rosenbach v. Six Flags

Rosenbach v. Six Flags — Illinois Supreme Court Foundational BIPA Standing Decision
IL · Rosenbach v. Six Flags Entm't Corp., 2019 IL 123186, 129 N.E.3d 1197

Status
In effect
Took effect
January 25, 2019
Applies to
Private entities collecting biometric identifiers in Illinois

The Illinois Supreme Court ruled in January 2019 that a BIPA plaintiff does not need to plead actual injury to be 'aggrieved' under the statute — a violation of BIPA's notice/consent requirements is itself the injury. This made BIPA the most consequential biometric-privacy statute in the U.S. and triggered a wave of AI-faceprint, voiceprint, and fingerprint litigation.

Who is protected: Illinois residents subject to biometric data collection without statutory consent

Legal detail

Rosenbach v. Six Flags Entertainment Corp., 2019 IL 123186, 129 N.E.3d 1197 (Ill. Jan. 25, 2019). Holding: 'aggrieved' under 740 ILCS 14/20 does not require allegation of actual injury; a violation of BIPA § 15 by itself confers private right of action.

Key facts

JurisdictionIL
LevelState
StrengthLimited
CitationRosenbach v. Six Flags Entm't Corp., 2019 IL 123186, 129 N.E.3d 1197
Topicsbiometric data · consumer data privacy
Court recordRosenbach v. Six Flags — Illinois Supreme Court opinion

More AI rules in IL

Related biometric data rules elsewhere

See something wrong or out of date? Submit a correction. Every entry must carry a verifiable source.