Yakima County WA six-month data center moratorium (2026)

Yakima County, Washington — Commissioners Pass a Six-Month Data Center Moratorium in a County That Currently Has NO Data-Center-Specific Regulations in Its Code (2026)
Yakima County, WA · Yakima County, Wash. — six-month data center moratorium (2026)

Status
In effect
Expires
March 1, 2027
Applies to
Data center developers in Yakima County's zoning jurisdiction during the moratorium
Enforced by
Yakima County Board of Commissioners

Yakima County's commissioners passed a SIX-MONTH data center moratorium. The reason is stated plainly in the reporting: the county CURRENTLY DOES NOT HAVE ANY DATA-CENTER-SPECIFIC REGULATIONS IN ITS CODE. That diagnosis appears again and again across this dataset and it is the most common single trigger for a pause — Sauk County's supervisor said the county had no mechanism in its zoning ordinance to address a data center proposal; Newport's Unified Development Ordinance did not address data centers or establish standards; Clayton, Ohio staff observed a facility could be admitted as a warehouse-type use under a code with no definition; Palm Springs had no definition in either its municipal or zoning code; and in Forest Park, Georgia the silence let Digital Realty build by right. A code that says nothing about data centers is not neutral toward them. It is permissive, because a use the code does not name is usually a use the code cannot condition. Washington's framework caps a moratorium at six months, renewable on further findings, so Yakima County has taken the full initial term available.

Who is protected: Residents of Yakima County, Washington

Legal detail

Yakima County, Wash. — SIX-MONTH DATA CENTER MORATORIUM passed by the Board of Commissioners. STATED TRIGGER, QUOTED: 'Yakima County currently doesn't have any data-center-specific regulations in its code.' THIS IS THE CODE-SILENCE DIAGNOSIS AND IT IS THE MOST FREQUENTLY RECURRING TRIGGER IN THIS DATASET: Sauk County WI 18-month data center moratorium (2026) (Supervisor Kinsman: the county has no specific mechanism in its zoning ordinance to address a data center proposal); Newport NC data center moratorium (2026) (the UDO does not specifically address data centers or establish standards); Clayton OH 365-day data center moratorium (2026) (a data center admissible as a WAREHOUSE-type use under an undefined code); Palm Springs Data Center Moratorium (2026) (no definition in municipal or zoning code); Forest Park GA 90-day data center moratorium (2026) (Digital Realty building BY RIGHT for that reason); Marysville KS 12-month data center moratorium (2026) (whose response was an unusually complete definition). THE UNDERLYING PROPOSITION, WHICH THIS DATASET NOW RECORDS FROM MANY DIRECTIONS: a zoning code silent on data centers is not neutral but PERMISSIVE, because an unnamed use is generally an unconditioned one, admitted under whatever adjacent category it most resembles. WASHINGTON FRAMEWORK: RCW 36.70A.390 and RCW 35A.63.220 permit a moratorium or interim control of UP TO SIX MONTHS, renewable for further six-month periods on additional findings (or up to one year where a work plan is adopted), and require a public hearing within 60 days of adoption with findings of fact justifying the measure. A SIX-MONTH TERM IS THE FULL INITIAL PERIOD AVAILABLE. Port Angeles WA six-month data center moratorium (2026) records the same six-month term and the subsequent ratification hearing that framework contemplates. NOT ESTABLISHED: the vote, the exact date, the ordinance number, the operative scope, whether the § 36.70A.390 findings were adopted, and whether a hearing has been held.

Key facts

JurisdictionYakima County, WA
LevelCounty
StrengthModerate
EnactedSeptember 1, 2026
CitationYakima County, Wash. — six-month data center moratorium (2026)
Private right of actionNo, agency enforcement only
PenaltiesNot stated in the located source
Topicsdata-center siting and energy · consumer protection · government use of AI
News reportYakima County commissioners pass six-month data center moratorium — Yakima Herald-Republic

Related data-center siting and energy rules elsewhere

See something wrong or out of date? Submit a correction. Every entry must carry a verifiable source.