AI Laws in Bloomington, Illinois

AI Laws USA tracks 36 AI rules that apply to people and businesses in Bloomington, Illinois: 10+ federal rules, 24 Illinois state-level rules, and 2 local Bloomington/county ordinances. Coverage is strongest on consumer protection, automated decision-making, consumer data privacy, and AI disclosure and transparency. 22 of these rules are already in effect. Each entry below links to its official source.

Bloomington local AI rules (and McLean County)

2 local AI rules specific to Bloomington, Illinois or McLean County.

  1. In effect Strength: moderate

    Bloomington Data Center Moratorium

    Bloomington, IL · Effective May 26, 2026 · Bloomington, Ill., data center moratorium (adopted May 26, 2026)

    Bloomington, Illinois paused data center development for six months. The City Council voted unanimously on May 26, 2026 to halt any facility designed with a capacity greater than 5 megawatts while the city writes data center regulations, with at least two public hearings required during the pause. The council can extend the moratorium beyond six months if needed.

    View full entry · Agency page

  2. In effect Strength: moderate

    McLean County Data Center Rules

    McLean County, IL · Effective June 11, 2026 · McLean County, Ill., zoning text amendment (adopted June 11, 2026)

    McLean County, Illinois — home to large planned data center campuses near Bloomington-Normal — adopted stricter zoning rules for data centers on June 11, 2026. Facility owners must identify and address impacts to roads, emergency services, and utilities; document planned water use, sources, groundwater effects, and wastewater handling; monitor and document electricity consumption; provide specialized training or equipment for the local fire protection district; and file a decommissioning plan with costs for restoring the site when the data center closes.

    View full entry · News report

Illinois-level AI rules most relevant to Bloomington

24 Illinois state rules apply to residents and businesses in Bloomington. Showing the 8 most relevant to Bloomington's local picture; 16 more are on the Illinois jurisdiction page.

  1. In effect Strength: moderate

    Illinois data center tax-incentive pause (DCEO, July 2026)

    Illinois · Effective July 1, 2026 · Office of Gov. JB Pritzker, 'Gov. Pritzker Pauses New Data Center Tax Incentives' (June 5, 2026); Data Center Investment Program pause effective July 1, 2026

    Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker told the state Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity to stop processing new agreements under the Data Center Investment Program, the state's data center tax-incentive program, starting July 1, 2026. Agreements signed before July 1 will be honored. He also set out a seven-point framework he wants lawmakers to pass, covering data centers paying their own grid costs, clean energy, water permits, air quality and community transparency. The pause does not ban data centers; the regulations require legislation, which did not pass in the spring session.

    View full entry · Agency page

  2. In effect Strength: stronger

    HB 3773 (AI Employment Discrimination)

    Illinois · Effective January 1, 2026 · P.A. 103-0804, amending 775 ILCS 5; P.A. 104-0425 (SB 2487, 2026 civil penalty amendment)

    Illinois employers may not use AI in ways that discriminate against protected classes in recruitment, hiring, promotion, discipline, discharge, or other employment terms, and may not use zip codes as a proxy for protected characteristics. Employers must notify workers and applicants when AI is used in employment decisions.

    View full entry · Statute

  3. In effect Strength: limited

    IL Bar AI Standing Committee

    IL · Effective January 1, 2025 · Ill. Sup. Ct. Policy on AI (eff. Jan. 1, 2025)

    Illinois Supreme Court adopted a Policy on Artificial Intelligence (effective January 1, 2025) authorizing AI use by attorneys, judges, and court staff provided it complies with legal and ethical standards. The policy explicitly states that disclosure of AI use should not be required in a pleading, and does not impose mandatory CLE requirements; instead it supports ongoing education on AI and holds all users accountable for thoroughly reviewing AI-generated content before submission.

    View full entry · Agency page

  4. In effect Strength: limited

    Policy on the Acceptable and Responsible Use of Artificial I

    Illinois · Effective April 1, 2025 · Policy on the Acceptable and Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence

    The Illinois DoIT policy governs how state agencies under the Governor's jurisdiction may develop, deploy, and use AI systems, requiring each utilizing agency to designate an AI point of contact and inventory deployed AI systems within 30 days.

    View full entry · Agency page

  5. In effect Strength: moderate

    IL WOPR (AI therapy ban)

    IL · Effective August 1, 2025 · P.A. 104-0054; 225 ILCS 8/

    Illinois banned AI-only therapy and made it unlawful for AI products to claim or imply they can provide mental-health treatment without a licensed clinician supervising. Aimed at consumer-protection harms from companion/therapy chatbots that misrepresent clinical credentials.

    View full entry · Statute

  6. In effect Strength: limited

    IL DOI AI Bulletin

    IL · Effective March 13, 2024 · Illinois DOI Company Bulletin 2024-08 (2024-03-13)

    The IL Department of Insurance adopted the NAIC Model Bulletin on Use of Artificial Intelligence Systems by Insurers. Insurers licensed in IL must maintain a written AI program with governance, risk-management, testing, third-party-AI oversight, and documentation controls. The bulletin operationalizes existing unfair-trade-practice and unfair-discrimination law as applied to insurers' AI use cases — underwriting, pricing, claims, fraud detection, and marketing.

    View full entry · Agency page

  7. In effect Strength: limited

    IL EO 2026-07 AI Cabinet (2026)

    Illinois · Effective September 22, 2026 · Ill. Exec. Order No. 2026-07 (Sept. 22, 2026)

    Governor Pritzker created an unpaid AI Cabinet of outside experts and senior officials from seven state agencies to study AI risks to Illinois residents and critical infrastructure, plan for AI incidents, and recommend policies. It is told to look at whether the state should tie data center tax incentives and permits to AI safety standards, how to address data centers' burden on the power grid and ratepayers, AI safety terms in state contracts, and whether current law lets people hold AI companies accountable for harm. It is advisory only and ends by December 31, 2027.

    View full entry · Agency page

  8. Expired

    Algorithmic rent price-fixing ban

    Illinois · IL SB343 (104th General Assembly, 2025-2026)

    Would amend the Illinois Antitrust Act to ban landlords from using shared rent-setting algorithms or third-party pricing software (such as RealPage) to coordinate residential rental prices. Targets "algorithmic" or "AI-enabled" rent price-fixing, where competing landlords feed data into a common service that recommends prices, indirectly coordinating rents across the market. Prohibits fixing, controlling, or maintaining rental pricing or terms for residential units, including through any service or product that involves price coordination.

    View full entry · Bill text

See all 24 Illinois AI rules

Federal AI rules that apply in Bloomington, Illinois

These federal rules apply everywhere in the United States, including Bloomington, Illinois. Showing the 10 strongest and most recent.

  1. In effect Strength: stronger

    TVA data center capacity commitment charge (2026)

    Tennessee Valley Authority · Effective October 1, 2026 · Tenn. Valley Auth. Bd. of Dirs. — Data Center Capacity Commitment Charge (approved Aug. 20, 2026; eff. Oct. 1, 2026)

    The Tennessee Valley Authority's Board of Directors approved a separate, higher wholesale rate for data centers on August 20, 2026, effective October 1. New or expanding data center loads above 5 megawatts now fall under a Capacity Commitment Charge attached to TVA's data center rate schedules, designed to recover the incremental capacity costs those customers impose on the system. The headline figures are substantial: upfront capacity commitment charges of roughly $1.5 million per megawatt, payable over three to five years, and an all-in average billing increase for data center customers of about 10%, phased in across three consecutive fiscal years. The stated purpose is to keep residential rates low while still serving growing data center demand. TVA matters here out of proportion to a single utility. It is a federal corporate agency supplying power across seven states, so this is not a state rate case but a regional cost-allocation decision reaching a large share of the Southeast — and TVA is among the first large US utilities to adopt a tariff aimed specifically at AI-driven load. Where most 2026 measures in this dataset restrict where data centers may be built, this one changes what they pay to run.

    View full entry · News report

  2. In effect Strength: stronger

    Bartz v. Anthropic

    N.D. Cal. · Effective September 5, 2025 · Bartz v. Anthropic PBC, No. 3:24-cv-05417 (N.D. Cal.)

    Authors Andrea Bartz, Charles Graeber, and Kirk Wallace Johnson sued Anthropic over its use of pirated-book datasets to train Claude. In June 2025 Judge William Alsup ruled that training on lawfully purchased books was fair use. The piracy claims (LibGen ingestion) proceeded toward settlement; in September 2025 Anthropic agreed to a $1.5 billion class settlement covering ~500,000 works. Judge Alsup granted preliminary approval September 25, 2025 and final approval July 20, 2026. The appeal period runs through August 19, 2026; class members will not receive payments until at least end of 2026.

    View full entry · Court record

  3. In effect Strength: stronger

    COPPA + 2025 Rule (childrens data)

    United States · Effective June 23, 2025 · 15 U.S.C. §§ 6501–6506; 16 C.F.R. Part 312

    COPPA requires online services aimed at children under 13 to get verifiable parental consent before collecting kids' personal data. The 2025 rule update — fully in effect since April 22, 2026 — adds biometric identifiers (like face templates and voiceprints, which matter for AI tools), requires separate parental consent before sharing children's data for targeted advertising, and tightens data retention limits.

    View full entry · Agency page

  4. In effect Strength: stronger

    TAKE IT DOWN Act

    United States · Effective May 19, 2025 · Pub. L. No. 119-12 (S. 146)

    Makes it a federal crime to knowingly publish intimate images of someone without consent, including AI-generated deepfakes. Social media and similar platforms must give victims a way to request removal and must take the content (and known copies) down within 48 hours. The platform removal requirement became enforceable May 19, 2026, and the FTC has already begun enforcement.

    View full entry · Agency page

  5. Blocked / in litigation

    NetChoice v. Yost (Ohio)

    S.D. Ohio · Effective April 16, 2025 · NetChoice, LLC v. Yost, No. 2:24-cv-00047 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 16, 2025)

    Ohio's Social Media Parental Notification Act — requiring parental consent for minors' social-media use, including algorithmic feeds — was preliminarily enjoined on February 12, 2024, then permanently enjoined on April 16, 2025 when the district court granted summary judgment for NetChoice. The state appealed to the Sixth Circuit, which vacated the district court's injunction in 2026.

    View full entry · Court record

  6. In effect Strength: stronger

    Thaler v. Perlmutter (Copyright)

    D.C. Cir. · Effective March 18, 2025 · Thaler v. Perlmutter, 130 F.4th 1039 (D.C. Cir. 2025)

    The companion copyright case: Stephen Thaler sought to register a copyright with 'Creativity Machine' (his AI) as the author. The D.C. Circuit affirmed in March 2025 that the Copyright Act's human-authorship requirement is dispositive as a matter of statutory law. AI cannot be a copyright author under U.S. law.

    View full entry · Court record

  7. In effect Strength: stronger

    Louis v. SafeRent

    D. Mass. · Effective November 20, 2024 · Louis v. SafeRent Solutions, LLC, No. 1:22-cv-10800 (D. Mass.)

    SafeRent agreed in November 2024 to a $2.275M settlement and a five-year ban on using its 'SafeRent Score' for housing-voucher applicants, after a class action alleged its AI tenant-screening tool systematically denied housing to Black and Hispanic Section 8 voucher holders. The first major AI tenant-screening Fair Housing Act settlement.

    View full entry · Court record

  8. In effect Strength: stronger

    FTC Impersonation Rule (AI)

    United States · Effective April 1, 2024 · 16 C.F.R. Part 461; 89 Fed. Reg. 15017

    The FTC's Impersonation Rule lets the agency directly sue scammers who pretend to be a government agency or a real business — including those who use AI-cloned voices or generated images to do so. Civil penalties can reach $53,088 per violation. The FTC also issued a supplemental notice in February 2024 proposing to extend the rule to all individual impersonation.

    View full entry · Agency page

  9. In effect Strength: stronger

    FTC v. Rite Aid

    FTC · Effective February 26, 2024 · FTC v. Rite Aid Corp., No. 2:23-cv-05023 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 19, 2023)

    The FTC banned Rite Aid from using facial-recognition technology in its stores for five years after finding the pharmacy chain's FRT system falsely tagged customers — disproportionately women and people of color — as shoplifters, leading to wrongful detentions and humiliations.

    View full entry · Agency page

  10. In effect Strength: stronger

    TCPA (AI voice calls)

    United States · Effective February 8, 2024 · 47 U.S.C. § 227; FCC 24-17

    Robocalls using AI-cloned or AI-generated voices are treated like other 'artificial voice' calls: callers need your prior express consent, must identify themselves, and must offer opt-outs for telemarketing. You can personally sue violators for $500 to $1,500 per illegal call.

    View full entry · Agency page

See all federal AI rules

Frequently asked questions about AI laws in Bloomington, Illinois

Are there AI laws in Bloomington, Illinois?
Yes. We index 2 local AI rules that specifically apply in Bloomington, Illinois, including Bloomington Data Center Moratorium, McLean County Data Center Rules. On top of that, 24 Illinois state-level rules and 10+ federal AI rules apply throughout the city.
What federal AI rules apply in Bloomington?
Every federal AI rule in our index applies in Bloomington, Illinois. The highest-strength federal rules currently include TVA data center capacity commitment charge (2026), Bartz v. Anthropic, COPPA + 2025 Rule (childrens data). 10+ federal entries are tracked in total.
Does Illinois have an AI privacy law?
Illinois has 18 privacy- or automated-decision-related AI rules in our index, including IL BIPA (2008, first-in-nation biometric law) and BIPA. These apply to residents of Bloomington.
Are deepfakes illegal in Illinois?
Illinois has 2 deepfake- or AI-image-related laws in our index, including IL Digital Voice/Likeness Act and Illinois HB 3851 — deepfake cyberbullying in schools (2026). Additionally, the federal TAKE IT DOWN Act covers non-consensual intimate-image deepfakes nationwide.
Can my employer use AI to screen me for jobs in Bloomington?
Employer use of AI to screen job applicants in Bloomington, Illinois is governed by BIPA and HB 3773 (AI Employment Discrimination). Federal civil-rights and EEOC guidance also applies.
How do I report an AI law violation in Bloomington?
Most AI rules are enforced by an agency listed on each individual entry. For Illinois state laws, the Illinois Attorney General's office is the usual starting point. For federal AI rules, file complaints with the relevant federal agency (FTC, EEOC, HUD, CFPB, etc.) named on each entry. We also accept tips at feedback@ailawsusa.com.
Are facial recognition cameras allowed in Bloomington?
Facial-recognition use in Bloomington, Illinois is addressed by IL BIPA (2008, first-in-nation biometric law) and BIPA. See those entries for what is allowed, who must comply, and enforcement details.
Is Bloomington regulated by Illinois's consumer privacy act?
Yes. Illinois state laws apply uniformly to residents and businesses operating in Bloomington. See the Illinois jurisdiction page for the complete list of consumer-protection and privacy rules.

Compliance guides for Illinois businesses

Plain-English guides to the Illinois AI and data laws companies most often need to comply with:

Illinois biometric privacy law (BIPA) · Illinois AI Video Interview Act

Have we missed an AI rule in Bloomington?

This page is generated from our open civic dataset. If you know of a Bloomington ordinance, county rule, or local enforcement action we should add, email feedback@ailawsusa.com or submit a correction. Every entry must include a verifiable source.