AI Laws in Lawrenceville, Georgia
AI Laws USA tracks 23 AI rules that apply to people and businesses in Lawrenceville, Georgia: 10+ federal rules, 12 Georgia state-level rules, and 1 local Lawrenceville ordinance. Coverage is strongest on automated decision-making, AI disclosure and transparency, children's online safety, and consumer protection. 8 of these rules are already in effect. Each entry below links to its official source.
Lawrenceville local AI rules (and Gwinnett County)
1 local AI rule specific to Lawrenceville, Georgia or Gwinnett County.
-
In effect Strength: limited
Gwinnett County GA Public Schools
Lawrenceville, GA · Effective July 15, 2024 · Gwinnett County GA Public Schools — Guidance for Human-Centered AI Use (2024-07-15)
Requires critical review of AI-generated content and humans in the loop; prohibits privacy-compromising uses. Paired with the GCPS AI-Ready Framework developed with Google, Microsoft, and higher-ed partners.
Georgia-level AI rules most relevant to Lawrenceville
12 Georgia state rules apply to residents and businesses in Lawrenceville. Showing the 8 most relevant to Lawrenceville's local picture; 4 more are on the Georgia jurisdiction page.
-
In effect Strength: limited
Board of Regents Policy 6.28, Use of Artificial Intelligence
University System of Georgia (USG) · Effective April 16, 2025 · Board of Regents Policy 6.28, Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Academic Contexts
The USG Board of Regents adopted a policy requiring all 26 institutions to establish ethical, responsible, and secure AI-use policies integrated into their academic-integrity codes.
-
Enacted (not yet in effect) Strength: limited
SB 540 (GA Chatbot Safety)
Georgia · Effective July 1, 2027 · Ga. SB 540 (2025-2026 Reg. Sess.), signed May 15, 2026; effective July 1, 2027
Georgia — the first Republican-led state to do so — enacted a chatbot safety law. Operators must tell users they're talking to AI, verify ages, give parents controls, and follow crisis protocols (like referring to the 988 lifeline) when users express suicidal thoughts. Chatbots talking to minors can't claim to be sentient, produce sexual content, simulate romance, encourage secrets from adults, or fake distress when a child ends the chat. No carve-out for chatbots inside big platforms. Effective July 1, 2027.
-
In effect Strength: limited
GA SB 219 (2017 AV statute)
Georgia · Effective July 1, 2017 · 2017 Ga. Laws Act 245
Georgia legalized fully driverless autonomous vehicles statewide, required AVs to be registered, insured ($250,000 minimum for fully autonomous vehicles), and capable of complying with traffic laws. The statute preempts local AV-specific ordinances.
-
Enacted (not yet in effect) Strength: limited
SB 444 (GA AI Insurance Review)
Georgia · Effective January 1, 2027 · Ga. SB 444 (2026), sponsored by Sen. Kay Kirkpatrick
Health insurers in Georgia can't let AI alone decide your coverage. Decisions about insurance coverage for healthcare services cannot be based solely on AI systems or software tools — a qualified human reviewer must be part of every coverage determination, especially before denying treatment. Effective January 1, 2027.
-
Expired
GA HB 679 End Rental Price Fixing Act (2025-2026, expired)
GA · GA HB 679, 125th GA General Assembly (2025-2026 Regular Session); O.C.G.A. Title 10 amendment
Georgia House Bill 679, introduced February 27, 2025, would have amended the 'Fair Business Practices Act of 1975' (O.C.G.A. Title 10, Chapter 1, Article 15, Part 2) to prohibit the use of AI, software, or algorithmic devices to coordinate rental prices among landlords. The bill would have made such algorithmic price-coordination agreements unenforceable as contracts in restraint of trade, and criminalized them with penalties of 1–5 years imprisonment and fines of $1,000–$5,000. The Georgia 2025–2026 regular session (first year) adjourned sine die on April 2, 2026 without the bill passing. A companion Senate bill, SB 559, was also introduced but similarly expired without passage. Georgia is one of the most active states for data center moratoriums but has not yet enacted state-level algorithmic rent regulation.
-
In effect Strength: limited
Rule Establishing Special Contract Terms for Large-Load Cust
Georgia Public Service Commission (Georgia Power) · Effective January 23, 2025 · Rule Establishing Special Contract Terms for Large-Load Customers Over 100 MW
The Georgia PSC unanimously approved a rule allowing Georgia Power to bill new customers using more than 100 MW under special terms, requiring them to cover transmission and distribution construction costs, permitting contracts up to 15 years, and mandating PSC review of each large-load contract.
-
In effect Strength: limited
Walters v. OpenAI
GA · Effective May 19, 2025 · Walters v. OpenAI, L.L.C., No. 23-A-04860-2 (Gwinnett Cty. Super. Ct., Ga.)
Georgia radio host Mark Walters sued OpenAI after ChatGPT fabricated a story that he had embezzled from a gun-rights nonprofit. In May 2025, Judge Tracie Cason granted summary judgment to OpenAI, holding that no reasonable reader would treat ChatGPT output as a statement of fact and that OpenAI's disclaimers about hallucinations defeated 'actual malice.' The first U.S. AI defamation case to reach a merits ruling.
-
In effect Strength: limited
GA SB 466 (no 'it's AI' defense for CSAM)
Georgia · Effective July 1, 2024 · Ga. SB 466 (2024); O.C.G.A. Sec. 16-12-100
Georgia's child sexual exploitation law was amended so that a defendant cannot escape liability by arguing the illegal imagery was artificially generated, adapted, or modified rather than a photograph of an actual child. If the material was created, adapted, or modified to appear that an identifiable minor is engaged in sexually explicit conduct, that is no defense to prosecution. This closes a potential loophole for AI-generated or computer-edited child sexual abuse material.
Federal AI rules that apply in Lawrenceville, Georgia
These federal rules apply everywhere in the United States, including Lawrenceville, Georgia. Showing the 10 strongest and most recent.
-
In effect Strength: stronger
TVA data center capacity commitment charge (2026)
Tennessee Valley Authority · Effective October 1, 2026 · Tenn. Valley Auth. Bd. of Dirs. — Data Center Capacity Commitment Charge (approved Aug. 20, 2026; eff. Oct. 1, 2026)
The Tennessee Valley Authority's Board of Directors approved a separate, higher wholesale rate for data centers on August 20, 2026, effective October 1. New or expanding data center loads above 5 megawatts now fall under a Capacity Commitment Charge attached to TVA's data center rate schedules, designed to recover the incremental capacity costs those customers impose on the system. The headline figures are substantial: upfront capacity commitment charges of roughly $1.5 million per megawatt, payable over three to five years, and an all-in average billing increase for data center customers of about 10%, phased in across three consecutive fiscal years. The stated purpose is to keep residential rates low while still serving growing data center demand. TVA matters here out of proportion to a single utility. It is a federal corporate agency supplying power across seven states, so this is not a state rate case but a regional cost-allocation decision reaching a large share of the Southeast — and TVA is among the first large US utilities to adopt a tariff aimed specifically at AI-driven load. Where most 2026 measures in this dataset restrict where data centers may be built, this one changes what they pay to run.
-
In effect Strength: stronger
Bartz v. Anthropic
N.D. Cal. · Effective September 5, 2025 · Bartz v. Anthropic PBC, No. 3:24-cv-05417 (N.D. Cal.)
Authors Andrea Bartz, Charles Graeber, and Kirk Wallace Johnson sued Anthropic over its use of pirated-book datasets to train Claude. In June 2025 Judge William Alsup ruled that training on lawfully purchased books was fair use. The piracy claims (LibGen ingestion) proceeded toward settlement; in September 2025 Anthropic agreed to a $1.5 billion class settlement covering ~500,000 works. Judge Alsup granted preliminary approval September 25, 2025 and final approval July 20, 2026. The appeal period runs through August 19, 2026; class members will not receive payments until at least end of 2026.
-
In effect Strength: stronger
COPPA + 2025 Rule (childrens data)
United States · Effective June 23, 2025 · 15 U.S.C. §§ 6501–6506; 16 C.F.R. Part 312
COPPA requires online services aimed at children under 13 to get verifiable parental consent before collecting kids' personal data. The 2025 rule update — fully in effect since April 22, 2026 — adds biometric identifiers (like face templates and voiceprints, which matter for AI tools), requires separate parental consent before sharing children's data for targeted advertising, and tightens data retention limits.
-
In effect Strength: stronger
TAKE IT DOWN Act
United States · Effective May 19, 2025 · Pub. L. No. 119-12 (S. 146)
Makes it a federal crime to knowingly publish intimate images of someone without consent, including AI-generated deepfakes. Social media and similar platforms must give victims a way to request removal and must take the content (and known copies) down within 48 hours. The platform removal requirement became enforceable May 19, 2026, and the FTC has already begun enforcement.
-
Blocked / in litigation
NetChoice v. Yost (Ohio)
S.D. Ohio · Effective April 16, 2025 · NetChoice, LLC v. Yost, No. 2:24-cv-00047 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 16, 2025)
Ohio's Social Media Parental Notification Act — requiring parental consent for minors' social-media use, including algorithmic feeds — was preliminarily enjoined on February 12, 2024, then permanently enjoined on April 16, 2025 when the district court granted summary judgment for NetChoice. The state appealed to the Sixth Circuit, which vacated the district court's injunction in 2026.
-
In effect Strength: stronger
Thaler v. Perlmutter (Copyright)
D.C. Cir. · Effective March 18, 2025 · Thaler v. Perlmutter, 130 F.4th 1039 (D.C. Cir. 2025)
The companion copyright case: Stephen Thaler sought to register a copyright with 'Creativity Machine' (his AI) as the author. The D.C. Circuit affirmed in March 2025 that the Copyright Act's human-authorship requirement is dispositive as a matter of statutory law. AI cannot be a copyright author under U.S. law.
-
In effect Strength: stronger
Louis v. SafeRent
D. Mass. · Effective November 20, 2024 · Louis v. SafeRent Solutions, LLC, No. 1:22-cv-10800 (D. Mass.)
SafeRent agreed in November 2024 to a $2.275M settlement and a five-year ban on using its 'SafeRent Score' for housing-voucher applicants, after a class action alleged its AI tenant-screening tool systematically denied housing to Black and Hispanic Section 8 voucher holders. The first major AI tenant-screening Fair Housing Act settlement.
-
In effect Strength: stronger
FTC Impersonation Rule (AI)
United States · Effective April 1, 2024 · 16 C.F.R. Part 461; 89 Fed. Reg. 15017
The FTC's Impersonation Rule lets the agency directly sue scammers who pretend to be a government agency or a real business — including those who use AI-cloned voices or generated images to do so. Civil penalties can reach $53,088 per violation. The FTC also issued a supplemental notice in February 2024 proposing to extend the rule to all individual impersonation.
-
In effect Strength: stronger
FTC v. Rite Aid
FTC · Effective February 26, 2024 · FTC v. Rite Aid Corp., No. 2:23-cv-05023 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 19, 2023)
The FTC banned Rite Aid from using facial-recognition technology in its stores for five years after finding the pharmacy chain's FRT system falsely tagged customers — disproportionately women and people of color — as shoplifters, leading to wrongful detentions and humiliations.
-
In effect Strength: stronger
TCPA (AI voice calls)
United States · Effective February 8, 2024 · 47 U.S.C. § 227; FCC 24-17
Robocalls using AI-cloned or AI-generated voices are treated like other 'artificial voice' calls: callers need your prior express consent, must identify themselves, and must offer opt-outs for telemarketing. You can personally sue violators for $500 to $1,500 per illegal call.
Frequently asked questions about AI laws in Lawrenceville, Georgia
Are there AI laws in Lawrenceville, Georgia?
What federal AI rules apply in Lawrenceville?
Does Georgia have an AI privacy law?
Are deepfakes illegal in Georgia?
Can my employer use AI to screen me for jobs in Lawrenceville?
How do I report an AI law violation in Lawrenceville?
Are facial recognition cameras allowed in Lawrenceville?
Is Lawrenceville regulated by Georgia's consumer privacy act?
Have we missed an AI rule in Lawrenceville?
This page is generated from our open civic dataset. If you know of a Lawrenceville ordinance, county rule, or local enforcement action we should add, email feedback@ailawsusa.com or submit a correction. Every entry must include a verifiable source.