AI Laws in Memphis, Tennessee

AI Laws USA tracks 24 AI rules that apply to people and businesses in Memphis, Tennessee: 10+ federal rules, 11 Tennessee state-level rules, and 3 local Memphis ordinances. Coverage is strongest on consumer protection, government use of AI, data-center siting and energy, and consumer data privacy. 12 of these rules are already in effect. Each entry below links to its official source.

Memphis local AI rules (and Shelby County County)

3 local AI rules specific to Memphis, Tennessee or Shelby County County.

  1. Proposed / pending

    Memphis TN data center moratorium Ord. 5982 (pending final reading)

    Memphis, TN · Memphis City Council Ordinance No. 5982 (data center temporary moratorium), second reading Sept. 2, 2026; final reading set Oct. 6, 2026

    The Memphis City Council is one vote away from a temporary pause on new data centers. Ordinance No. 5982, as written in August 2026, would stop the city from processing rezonings, use permits, site plans, building and grading permits for any new data center or 'high-density computing facility' (including AI processing and cryptocurrency mining) for 12 months or until permanent zoning rules are adopted, and would set up a study committee with council members, MLGW and industry experts. It passed first reading on Aug. 18 and second reading on Sept. 1, 2026. The final vote was delayed on Sept. 15 so the sponsor could fold in competing proposals; an amended version, which keeps the 12-month pause, the study committee and the exemption for existing non-expanding data centers and adds community engagement and progress reports, was postponed to Oct. 20, 2026. It is NOT in force.

    View full entry · Agency page

  2. Blocked / in litigation

    Memphis xAI Permit Challenge

    Memphis, TN · Inside Climate News, June 2026

    Memphis NAACP and community groups filed an administrative challenge to the air permits supporting xAI's Colossus data center, citing methane-gas-turbine emissions in South Memphis.

    View full entry · Agency page

  3. In effect Strength: limited

    Memphis xAI Colossus Permits

    Memphis, TN · Effective August 29, 2024 · Shelby Co. Health Dept., Air Construction Permit, xAI Colossus (2024)

    Shelby County Health Department air-permit approval for gas turbines powering xAI's Colossus AI data center in south Memphis, subject to ongoing environmental-justice challenges.

    View full entry · Agency page

Tennessee-level AI rules most relevant to Memphis

11 Tennessee state rules apply to residents and businesses in Memphis. Showing the 8 most relevant to Memphis's local picture; 3 more are on the Tennessee jurisdiction page.

  1. In effect Strength: limited

    TN HB 1847 data center ratepayer protection (2026)

    TN · Effective July 1, 2026 · Tenn. HB 1847/SB 2128 (114th G.A., 2026) — signed May 7, 2026; eff. July 1, 2026

    Tennessee HB 1847/SB 2128, signed May 7, 2026 and effective July 1, 2026, requires data centers drawing 50 megawatts or more of electricity to pay their proportionate share of transmission and distribution infrastructure costs, rather than spreading those costs across all utility ratepayers. The law prevents large hyperscale data centers from being cross-subsidized by ordinary residential and small commercial customers.

    View full entry · Bill text

  2. In effect Strength: limited

    TN SB 151 (2017 AV Act)

    Tennessee · Effective July 1, 2017 · 2017 Tenn. Pub. Acts Ch. 474; Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 55-30-101 et seq.

    Tennessee's Automated Vehicles Act authorized fully driverless operation on Tennessee roads, set minimum-insurance requirements for AV networks ($5 million coverage), explicitly preempted local AV-specific regulation, and treated the automated driving system as the legal operator for traffic-law purposes.

    View full entry · Bill text

  3. In effect Strength: limited

    UT System Policy IT0002 / procedure, Acceptable Use of Gener

    University of Tennessee System · Effective March 1, 2025 · UT System Policy IT0002 / procedure, Acceptable Use of Generative AI

    The University of Tennessee System's acceptable-use policy for generative AI bars entering FERPA/HIPAA-protected and confidential data into AI tools and requires independent verification and disclosure of AI-generated content.

    View full entry · Agency page

  4. In effect Strength: limited

    Attorney General Skrmetti Leads 44 States in Demanding Compa

    Tennessee · Effective August 25, 2025 · Attorney General Skrmetti Leads 44 States in Demanding Companies End Predatory AI Interactions with Kids

    Tennessee's Attorney General led a bipartisan coalition of 44 states in a demand letter to 12 major AI companies to implement safeguards against sexualized AI chatbot interactions with minors, applying consumer-protection authority to AI harms.

    View full entry · Agency page

  5. In effect Strength: moderate

    ELVIS Act

    Tennessee · Effective July 1, 2024 · Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 47-25-1101 to -1108 (ELVIS Act, 2024)

    The first US law protecting voices from AI cloning: Tennessee added 'voice' to its right-of-publicity law, so using AI to mimic someone's voice or likeness without permission is both a civil violation and a crime. It also allows lawsuits against those who distribute tools whose primary purpose is producing unauthorized voice or likeness replicas.

    View full entry · Agency page

  6. In effect Strength: limited

    Tennessee SB 837 (AI is not a 'person' under TN law)

    Tennessee · Effective April 23, 2026 · 2026 Tenn. Pub. Ch. 781 (SB 837); amends Tenn. Code Ann. Title 1

    Tennessee amended its rules of statutory construction to make clear that artificial intelligence and related technology are not legal persons. The law specifies that the terms 'person,' 'life,' and 'natural person' do not include artificial intelligence, computer algorithms, software programs, computer hardware, or any type of machine. It also adds definitions of 'human being' and 'natural person' as living members of homo sapiens. The change is purely definitional and creates no penalty.

    View full entry · Bill text

  7. In effect Strength: limited

    Tennessee SB 1580 (AI can't claim to be a mental health professional)

    Tennessee · Effective July 1, 2026 · 2026 Tenn. Pub. Ch. 647 (SB 1580); enforced under Tenn. Code Ann. 47-18-101 et seq. (TCPA)

    Tennessee makes it unlawful for anyone who develops or deploys an artificial intelligence system to advertise or represent to the public that the system is, or can act as, a qualified mental health professional. Violations are treated as unfair or deceptive acts under the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act. The law authorizes a civil penalty of up to $5,000 per violation, along with injunctive relief and damages, and includes a private right of action for affected individuals.

    View full entry · Bill text

  8. In effect Strength: limited

    Enterprise Artificial Intelligence Policy (200-POL-007)

    Tennessee · Effective January 1, 2024 · Enterprise Artificial Intelligence Policy (200-POL-007)

    Tennessee's Department of Finance and Administration (Strategic Technology Solutions) sets minimum requirements for valid, reliable, transparent, and ethical use of AI across state departments, requiring monitoring of AI design, deployment, and procurement to minimize negative impacts.

    View full entry · Agency page

See all 11 Tennessee AI rules

Federal AI rules that apply in Memphis, Tennessee

These federal rules apply everywhere in the United States, including Memphis, Tennessee. Showing the 10 strongest and most recent.

  1. In effect Strength: stronger

    TVA data center capacity commitment charge (2026)

    Tennessee Valley Authority · Effective October 1, 2026 · Tenn. Valley Auth. Bd. of Dirs. — Data Center Capacity Commitment Charge (approved Aug. 20, 2026; eff. Oct. 1, 2026)

    The Tennessee Valley Authority's Board of Directors approved a separate, higher wholesale rate for data centers on August 20, 2026, effective October 1. New or expanding data center loads above 5 megawatts now fall under a Capacity Commitment Charge attached to TVA's data center rate schedules, designed to recover the incremental capacity costs those customers impose on the system. The headline figures are substantial: upfront capacity commitment charges of roughly $1.5 million per megawatt, payable over three to five years, and an all-in average billing increase for data center customers of about 10%, phased in across three consecutive fiscal years. The stated purpose is to keep residential rates low while still serving growing data center demand. TVA matters here out of proportion to a single utility. It is a federal corporate agency supplying power across seven states, so this is not a state rate case but a regional cost-allocation decision reaching a large share of the Southeast — and TVA is among the first large US utilities to adopt a tariff aimed specifically at AI-driven load. Where most 2026 measures in this dataset restrict where data centers may be built, this one changes what they pay to run.

    View full entry · News report

  2. In effect Strength: stronger

    Bartz v. Anthropic

    N.D. Cal. · Effective September 5, 2025 · Bartz v. Anthropic PBC, No. 3:24-cv-05417 (N.D. Cal.)

    Authors Andrea Bartz, Charles Graeber, and Kirk Wallace Johnson sued Anthropic over its use of pirated-book datasets to train Claude. In June 2025 Judge William Alsup ruled that training on lawfully purchased books was fair use. The piracy claims (LibGen ingestion) proceeded toward settlement; in September 2025 Anthropic agreed to a $1.5 billion class settlement covering ~500,000 works. Judge Alsup granted preliminary approval September 25, 2025 and final approval July 20, 2026. The appeal period runs through August 19, 2026; class members will not receive payments until at least end of 2026.

    View full entry · Court record

  3. In effect Strength: stronger

    COPPA + 2025 Rule (childrens data)

    United States · Effective June 23, 2025 · 15 U.S.C. §§ 6501–6506; 16 C.F.R. Part 312

    COPPA requires online services aimed at children under 13 to get verifiable parental consent before collecting kids' personal data. The 2025 rule update — fully in effect since April 22, 2026 — adds biometric identifiers (like face templates and voiceprints, which matter for AI tools), requires separate parental consent before sharing children's data for targeted advertising, and tightens data retention limits.

    View full entry · Agency page

  4. In effect Strength: stronger

    TAKE IT DOWN Act

    United States · Effective May 19, 2025 · Pub. L. No. 119-12 (S. 146)

    Makes it a federal crime to knowingly publish intimate images of someone without consent, including AI-generated deepfakes. Social media and similar platforms must give victims a way to request removal and must take the content (and known copies) down within 48 hours. The platform removal requirement became enforceable May 19, 2026, and the FTC has already begun enforcement.

    View full entry · Agency page

  5. Blocked / in litigation

    NetChoice v. Yost (Ohio)

    S.D. Ohio · Effective April 16, 2025 · NetChoice, LLC v. Yost, No. 2:24-cv-00047 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 16, 2025)

    Ohio's Social Media Parental Notification Act — requiring parental consent for minors' social-media use, including algorithmic feeds — was preliminarily enjoined on February 12, 2024, then permanently enjoined on April 16, 2025 when the district court granted summary judgment for NetChoice. The state appealed to the Sixth Circuit, which vacated the district court's injunction in 2026.

    View full entry · Court record

  6. In effect Strength: stronger

    Thaler v. Perlmutter (Copyright)

    D.C. Cir. · Effective March 18, 2025 · Thaler v. Perlmutter, 130 F.4th 1039 (D.C. Cir. 2025)

    The companion copyright case: Stephen Thaler sought to register a copyright with 'Creativity Machine' (his AI) as the author. The D.C. Circuit affirmed in March 2025 that the Copyright Act's human-authorship requirement is dispositive as a matter of statutory law. AI cannot be a copyright author under U.S. law.

    View full entry · Court record

  7. In effect Strength: stronger

    Louis v. SafeRent

    D. Mass. · Effective November 20, 2024 · Louis v. SafeRent Solutions, LLC, No. 1:22-cv-10800 (D. Mass.)

    SafeRent agreed in November 2024 to a $2.275M settlement and a five-year ban on using its 'SafeRent Score' for housing-voucher applicants, after a class action alleged its AI tenant-screening tool systematically denied housing to Black and Hispanic Section 8 voucher holders. The first major AI tenant-screening Fair Housing Act settlement.

    View full entry · Court record

  8. In effect Strength: stronger

    FTC Impersonation Rule (AI)

    United States · Effective April 1, 2024 · 16 C.F.R. Part 461; 89 Fed. Reg. 15017

    The FTC's Impersonation Rule lets the agency directly sue scammers who pretend to be a government agency or a real business — including those who use AI-cloned voices or generated images to do so. Civil penalties can reach $53,088 per violation. The FTC also issued a supplemental notice in February 2024 proposing to extend the rule to all individual impersonation.

    View full entry · Agency page

  9. In effect Strength: stronger

    FTC v. Rite Aid

    FTC · Effective February 26, 2024 · FTC v. Rite Aid Corp., No. 2:23-cv-05023 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 19, 2023)

    The FTC banned Rite Aid from using facial-recognition technology in its stores for five years after finding the pharmacy chain's FRT system falsely tagged customers — disproportionately women and people of color — as shoplifters, leading to wrongful detentions and humiliations.

    View full entry · Agency page

  10. In effect Strength: stronger

    TCPA (AI voice calls)

    United States · Effective February 8, 2024 · 47 U.S.C. § 227; FCC 24-17

    Robocalls using AI-cloned or AI-generated voices are treated like other 'artificial voice' calls: callers need your prior express consent, must identify themselves, and must offer opt-outs for telemarketing. You can personally sue violators for $500 to $1,500 per illegal call.

    View full entry · Agency page

See all federal AI rules

Frequently asked questions about AI laws in Memphis, Tennessee

Are there AI laws in Memphis, Tennessee?
Yes. We index 3 local AI rules that specifically apply in Memphis, Tennessee, including Memphis TN data center moratorium Ord. 5982 (pending final reading), Memphis xAI Permit Challenge, Memphis xAI Colossus Permits. On top of that, 11 Tennessee state-level rules and 10+ federal AI rules apply throughout the city.
What federal AI rules apply in Memphis?
Every federal AI rule in our index applies in Memphis, Tennessee. The highest-strength federal rules currently include TVA data center capacity commitment charge (2026), Bartz v. Anthropic, COPPA + 2025 Rule (childrens data). 10+ federal entries are tracked in total.
Does Tennessee have an AI privacy law?
Tennessee has 6 privacy- or automated-decision-related AI rules in our index, including TN drone trespass / FFUSA and TN SB 151 (2017 AV Act). These apply to residents of Memphis.
Are deepfakes illegal in Tennessee?
Tennessee has 2 deepfake- or AI-image-related laws in our index, including ELVIS Act and Tennessee HB 2163 (AI-generated child abuse images are illegal 'material'). Additionally, the federal TAKE IT DOWN Act covers non-consensual intimate-image deepfakes nationwide.
Can my employer use AI to screen me for jobs in Memphis?
Memphis, Tennessee has no AI-employment-screening-specific rule in our index. Federal Title VII, ADA, and EEOC guidance still apply, plus any general Tennessee anti-discrimination statutes.
How do I report an AI law violation in Memphis?
Most AI rules are enforced by an agency listed on each individual entry. For Tennessee state laws, the Tennessee Attorney General's office is the usual starting point. For federal AI rules, file complaints with the relevant federal agency (FTC, EEOC, HUD, CFPB, etc.) named on each entry. We also accept tips at feedback@ailawsusa.com.
Are facial recognition cameras allowed in Memphis?
Memphis, Tennessee has no facial-recognition-specific rule in our index. Use by private businesses is largely unregulated, while government use is governed by general Fourth Amendment and Tennessee law.
Is Memphis regulated by Tennessee's consumer privacy act?
Yes. Tennessee state laws apply uniformly to residents and businesses operating in Memphis. See the Tennessee jurisdiction page for the complete list of consumer-protection and privacy rules.

Have we missed an AI rule in Memphis?

This page is generated from our open civic dataset. If you know of a Memphis ordinance, county rule, or local enforcement action we should add, email feedback@ailawsusa.com or submit a correction. Every entry must include a verifiable source.