California EO N-9-26 — accelerated AI oversight and kill-switch study
California — Executive Order N-9-26, Signed September 18, 2026: Orders the Government Operations Agency to ACCELERATE Implementation of SB 813 and AB 1405 and to Convene National Experts Who Must Deliver Recommendations Within Two Months on Onsite Independent Verification Inside Frontier AI Labs, Verified Safety Frameworks, a Frontier-Model 'Kill Switch,' and Loss-of-Control Incident Reporting
California · Cal. Exec. Order No. N-9-26 (Sept. 18, 2026)
- Status
- In effect
- Took effect
- September 18, 2026
- Applies to
- The California Government Operations Agency (acceleration of SB 813 and AB 1405 implementation; convening the expert group) and the Governor's Office of Emergency Services (consultation). NO obligation is imposed on frontier AI developers or any other private party by this order; obligations on those companies exist, if at all, under SB 813 and AB 1405 themselves or under whatever legislation follows the recommendations.
- Enforced by
- California Government Operations Agency, in consultation with the Governor's Office of Emergency Services
California's governor signed an executive order on September 18, 2026 directing the Government Operations Agency to speed up how fast two already-enacted AI laws take effect — SB 813, which creates the framework for independent verification organizations that assess AI systems, and AB 1405, which creates the state registry and independence standards for AI auditors — and to convene national experts who have two months to recommend how to strengthen California's AI safety and security law. The order names four proposals the experts are asked to consider: putting a designated independent verification organization ONSITE inside frontier AI labs to run regular audits and evaluations; requiring that frontier companies' safety frameworks, transparency reports and risk assessments be VERIFIED against standards an independent verification organization deems adequate, rather than self-attested; advancing a 'kill switch' for frontier models whose effectiveness is itself verified on an ongoing basis by an independent verifier; and updating the definition of a critical safety incident to include LOSS-OF-CONTROL incidents. UNDERSTAND WHAT THIS ORDER IS. It imposes no new duty on any AI company today. It is an acceleration-and-recommendation instrument: it moves two existing statutes' timelines and it commissions a plan. The kill switch that led the headlines is a proposal the expert group is asked to consider, not a requirement now in force. The order's own framing is that the federal government has failed to act and that California will not wait — the substantive obligations, if they come, arrive through the recommendations and any legislation that follows.
Who is protected: Californians exposed to frontier AI model risk — the order's stated concern is catastrophic and loss-of-control incidents — and, indirectly, users of AI systems that SB 813 and AB 1405 subject to independent verification once those statutes are in force.
Legal detail
Cal. Exec. Order No. N-9-26 (Sept. 18, 2026). Directs the Government Operations Agency to (1) accelerate implementation timelines for SB 813 (framework for independent verification organizations to assess AI systems and models for compliance with state law) and AB 1405 (state registry of AI auditors with independence, transparency and integrity standards); and (2) in consultation with the Governor's Office of Emergency Services, convene national experts to develop recommendations within two months for strengthening state AI safety and security law. Proposals the order directs the expert group to consider, in the order's own language: 'Require frontier AI companies to embed a designated independent verification organization onsite in their labs to conduct regular audits and evaluations'; 'Require that the AI safety frameworks, transparency reports, and risk assessments … are verified pursuant to standards deemed adequate by an independent verification organization'; 'Advance the creation of a "kill switch" for frontier models, with the efficacy of the switch verified on an ongoing basis by an independent verification organization'; and 'Update definitions of critical safety incidents to include loss-of-control incidents.' The order cites no independent statutory authority for itself beyond the Governor's executive power, operating instead on the implementation of legislation already signed. No compliance obligation, deadline, or penalty attaches to any private party under the order as issued.
Key facts
| Jurisdiction | California |
|---|---|
| Level | State |
| Strength | Limited |
| Enacted | September 18, 2026 |
| Citation | Cal. Exec. Order No. N-9-26 (Sept. 18, 2026) |
| Private right of action | No, agency enforcement only |
| Penalties | None. The order creates no enforceable duty on any private party. |
| Topics | AI disclosure and transparency · government use of AI · automated decision-making · national security |
| Agency page | Governor Newsom issues executive order to accelerate independent oversight and advance the creation of an AI kill switch — Office of Governor Gavin Newsom |
More AI rules in California
- CA EO N-6-26 (AI Workforce) · In effect
- California AB 489 (AI healthcare chatbot misrepresentation ban) · In effect
- X.AI v. Bonta (AB 2013 training-data disclosure) · Blocked / in litigation
- CA SB 1168 — data center grid cost allocation · Enacted (not yet in effect)
- California SB 1119 Adam's Law, companion chatbots (2026) · Enacted (not yet in effect)
- California SB 867 AI chatbot toy moratorium (2026) · Enacted (not yet in effect)
Related AI disclosure and transparency rules elsewhere
- Trump AI Innovation & Security EO (June 2026) · In effect
- FERC order directing PJM and other grid operators to reform tariffs on… · Enacted (not yet in effect)
- Morris County resolution urging state oversight of data center power… · Enacted (not yet in effect)
- SU-47 Special-Use Data Center Zoning District Ordinance · Proposed / pending
- Cherokee Nation EO 2026-02-CTH (Data Center Task Force) · In effect
- NAIC AI Evaluation Tool Pilot (12 states, 2026) · Proposed / pending
See something wrong or out of date? Submit a correction. Every entry must carry a verifiable source.