Maryland Protection From Predatory Pricing Act (HB 895)
Maryland · 2026 Md. Laws ch. 154 (HB 895)
This law bars food retailers and third-party delivery service providers from using a consumer's personal data or dynamic (surveillance) pricing to set a higher price for tax-exempt food for a specific consumer. It also prohibits using protected-class data to offer, advertise, or sell goods in a way that withholds an accommodation or advantage from the consumer the data pertains to. Violations are treated as unfair, abusive, or deceptive trade practices under the Maryland Consumer Protection Act.
Technical detail
2026 Md. Laws ch. 154 (HB 895) prohibits food retailers and third-party delivery service providers from using personal data or dynamic pricing to set higher consumer-specific prices for tax-exempt food, and from using protected-class data to withhold an advantage, enforced as a Maryland Consumer Protection Act violation (excluding that Act's private-right-of-action provisions).
Who is protected: Consumers buying tax-exempt food from large food retailers and through third-party delivery services.
Who must comply: Food retailers (large establishments selling tax-exempt food) and third-party delivery service providers.
Key facts
| Jurisdiction | Maryland |
|---|---|
| Level | State |
| Status | Enacted (not yet in effect) |
| Protection strength | Limited protection |
| Effective date | 2026-10-01 |
| Enacted | 2026-05-08 |
| Citation | 2026 Md. Laws ch. 154 (HB 895) |
| Enforced by | Maryland Office of the Attorney General (Consumer Protection Division) under the Maryland Consumer Protection Act. |
| Private right of action | No — agency enforcement only |
| Penalties | As a Maryland Consumer Protection Act violation: a civil penalty of up to $10,000 for each violation and up to $25,000 for each repetition of the same violation. |
| Topics | automated decision-making · consumer protection |
| Last verified | 2026-06-16 |
| Official source | Maryland General Assembly — HB 895 (2026), Chapter 154 ↗ |
More AI rules in Maryland
- MD HB 1339 (Automated Decision Systems, 2026) · Enacted (not yet in effect)
- Maryland Online Data Privacy Act · In effect
- MD NCII Deepfake Law · In effect
- Maryland CSAM Law (computer-generated images) · In effect
- Maryland AI Governance Act (2024) · In effect
- Maryland HB 820 (AI in insurance utilization review) · In effect
Related automated decision-making rules elsewhere
- CA EO N-6-26 (AI Workforce) · In effect
- Arkansas public entity AI/ADS policy mandate (Act 848, 2025) · In effect
- Connecticut algorithmic rent ban — HB 8002 (eff. Jan 1, 2026) · In effect
- San Diego algorithmic rent price-fixing ban (Ord. O-21955, May 2025) · In effect
- Minneapolis algorithmic rent ban (Ord. 2025-010, eff. Mar 1, 2026) · In effect
- Seattle algorithmic rent-fixing ban (Ord. 127241 / SMC 7.34, July 2025) · In effect
See something wrong or out of date? Submit a correction — every entry must carry a verifiable official source.