Minnesota HF 2432 (2025) — CSAM Definition Expanded to Generative-AI Images
Minnesota · Minn. Stat. 617.246; Laws 2025, ch. 35 (HF 2432)
Minnesota expanded its child sexual abuse material law to cover images produced with generative AI. The definition now reaches a visual depiction of someone indistinguishable from an actual minor that is created by feeding prompts into generative AI or similar technology, shows the person engaged in sexual conduct, and is obscene. This closes a gap so that synthetic, AI-generated imagery can be prosecuted under the existing CSAM framework.
Technical detail
Minn. Stat. 617.246 (amended by Laws 2025, ch. 35) extends the definition of child sexual abuse material to a depiction 'indistinguishable from an actual minor created by the use of generative artificial intelligence' from prompts, depicting sexual conduct and obscene; existing CSAM criminal penalties apply.
Who is protected: Children, including those depicted in AI-generated synthetic imagery.
Who must comply: Anyone subject to Minnesota's CSAM prohibitions (creation, possession, dissemination, etc.).
Key facts
| Jurisdiction | Minnesota |
|---|---|
| Level | State |
| Status | In effect |
| Protection strength | Limited protection |
| Effective date | 2025-08-01 |
| Enacted | 2025-06-14 |
| Citation | Minn. Stat. 617.246; Laws 2025, ch. 35 (HF 2432) |
| Enforced by | Minnesota prosecutors / state criminal justice system; Minnesota Attorney General. |
| Private right of action | No — agency enforcement only |
| Penalties | Existing Minnesota criminal penalties for child sexual abuse material apply to the newly covered generative-AI depictions. |
| Topics | children's online safety · AI-generated images |
| Last verified | 2026-06-16 |
| Official source | Minnesota Statutes 617.246 — Possession of child sexual abuse material ↗ |
More AI rules in Minnesota
- MN drone-warrant law (2020) · In effect
- Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act · In effect
- MN Deepfake Law · In effect
- Minnesota SF 4097 (social-media algorithm disclosure) · In effect
- Public Artificial Intelligence Services Security Standard · In effect
Related children's online safety rules elsewhere
- PA v. Character.AI (Fake Psychiatrist Chatbot) · Blocked / in litigation
- RI AI Companion Self-Harm Safety (2026) · In effect
- Kids Internet and Digital Safety Act (KIDS Act) (H.R. 7757) · Proposed / pending
- Washington HB 2225 (AI chatbot disclosure, minor protections, crisis protocols) · Enacted (not yet in effect)
- Oregon SB 1546 (AI companion chatbot disclosure + private right of action) · Enacted (not yet in effect)
- xAI v. Harwood (Grok NCII Counter-Suit 2026) · Blocked / in litigation
See something wrong or out of date? Submit a correction — every entry must carry a verifiable official source.