Oregon SB 1516 — ALPR limits and vendor liability (2026)

Oregon SB 1516 (2026) — Limits Police Use of Automated License Plate Readers to Listed Purposes, 30-Day Retention, Bars Vendors From Using Plate Data, and Lets People Sue Vendors (Ch. 77, Effective March 31, 2026)
Oregon · Or. Laws 2026, ch. 77 (SB 1516), §§ 3-9

Status
In effect
Took effect
March 31, 2026
Applies to
Oregon law enforcement agencies using ALPRs; ALPR vendors contracting with them
Enforced by
Courts (private civil actions against vendors); agency policies

Oregon's SB 1516, signed March 31, 2026 and effective at once, limits how police can use automated license plate reader (ALPR) cameras. Police may use them only for listed purposes, such as finding vehicles linked to crimes, arrest warrants or missing people, uninsured or unregistered vehicles, parking or controlling secured areas. Plate data must be deleted after 30 days unless it relates to a criminal investigation or court case. ALPR vendors may not access, sell or share the data, and a person whose data a vendor misuses on purpose or through gross negligence can sue for damages. Lawmakers have said they may push for a full ban on Flock-style cameras in 2027.

Who is protected: People in Oregon whose vehicle and license plate data ALPR systems capture

Legal detail

Oregon SB 1516 (2026 R1), 'Relating to public safety; and declaring an emergency' (omnibus; ALPR provisions are Sections 3-9). HISTORY (OLIS): introduced 2026-02-02; Senate passed 2026-02-20, 27 ayes, 3 excused (carried by Prozanski); House passed 2026-03-05, 54-3, 3 excused (carried by Kropf); Governor signed 2026-03-31; Chapter 77, 2026 Laws; effective March 31, 2026. KEY TEXT (enrolled): Sec. 4(1) a law enforcement agency 'may not use an automated license plate recognition system or captured license plate data' except as provided, with allowed uses in Sec. 4(2): identifying vehicles used in crimes (Oregon crimes; substantially equivalent out-of-state crimes; federal crimes only where not contrary to ORS 24.500 / ORS 181A.250, 181A.820, 181A.826), non-traffic violations, vehicles of persons with outstanding criminal warrants (same federal limit), missing or endangered persons (Amber/Silver Alert), uninsured vehicles, unregistered vehicles, parking regulation, secured-area access control. Sec. 4(3): 30-day retention cap for data not tied to a court proceeding or ongoing criminal investigation. Sec. 5: limits on giving data to non-Oregon government entities (only for a law enforcement purpose, limited to relevant data, no unrestricted or ongoing access). Sec. 6: vendor-provided audits (searches, users, alerts, agencies with access). Sec. 7: agencies must publish ALPR policies before use; vendor contracts must keep data agency-owned, encrypted and CJIS-compliant, and make the vendor liable for misuse. Sec. 8: existing contracts may run out their term but cannot be extended or renewed unless compliant; Sec. 4 applies regardless. Sec. 9: vendors may not access, disclose, sell, share or otherwise use captured data (narrow exceptions for technical support with express consent, and audits); intentional or grossly negligent violations give the individual a civil action for economic and noneconomic damages, equitable relief and attorney fees; any person may sue to enjoin. The OLIS measure summary also mentions civil penalties; that term was not found in a keyword search of the enrolled text. CONTEXT: Oregon Capital Chronicle (Sept 24, 2026) reports Reps. Willy Chotzen (D-Portland) and Alek Skarlatos (R-Winston) plan 2027 legislation that could ban Flock cameras; no bill introduced yet.

Key facts

JurisdictionOregon
LevelState
StrengthStronger
EnactedMarch 31, 2026
CitationOr. Laws 2026, ch. 77 (SB 1516), §§ 3-9
Private right of actionYes, individuals can sue
PenaltiesCivil action against vendors for economic and noneconomic damages, equitable relief and attorney fees (Sec. 9); injunctions available to any person
Topicspolice and surveillance AI · consumer data privacy · data retention · government use of AI
Bill textSB 1516 2026 Regular Session — Oregon Legislative Information System

More AI rules in Oregon

Related police and surveillance AI rules elsewhere

See something wrong or out of date? Submit a correction. Every entry must carry a verifiable source.