AI Laws in Ann Arbor, Michigan

AI Laws USA tracks 29 AI rules that apply to people and businesses in Ann Arbor, Michigan: 10+ federal rules, 19 Michigan state-level rules (no Ann Arbor-specific ordinances are indexed yet). Coverage is strongest on data-center siting and energy, automated decision-making, consumer protection, and deepfakes. 11 of these rules are already in effect. Each entry below links to its official source.

Ann Arbor local AI rules (and Washtenaw County)

No city- or county-specific AI ordinances are currently indexed for Ann Arbor, Michigan.

  1. No local entries yet: we don't currently index any Ann Arbor-specific AI ordinances. Federal and Michigan state rules still apply throughout the city. Have we missed something? Email feedback@ailawsusa.com.

Michigan-level AI rules most relevant to Ann Arbor

19 Michigan state rules apply to residents and businesses in Ann Arbor. Showing the 8 most relevant to Ann Arbor's local picture; 11 more are on the Michigan jurisdiction page.

  1. In effect Strength: moderate

    Michigan PSC DTE–Google data center contracts

    Michigan · Effective October 1, 2026 · Michigan PSC Case No. U-22058 (order Oct. 1, 2026)

    Michigan's Public Service Commission approved DTE Electric's special power contracts with Google for a planned data center in Van Buren Township, on the condition that other customers do not bear the project's costs. The 20-year deal includes a minimum bill of 80% of contracted capacity and an early-exit payment covering at least 15 years of minimum charges. Google must also pay for up to 1,600 MW of renewable energy and 480 MW of battery storage built by DTE.

    View full entry · Agency page

  2. In effect Strength: limited

    MI SAVE Acts (2016 AV package)

    Michigan · Effective December 9, 2016 · P.A. 332–335 of 2016

    Michigan's 2016 four-bill 'SAVE' package made the state one of the most comprehensive AV jurisdictions: it legalized fully driverless operation, authorized commercial AV networks (ride-hail with self-driving cars), allowed truck platooning, established the American Center for Mobility, and explicitly limited manufacturer liability when third parties convert vehicles to autonomous operation.

    View full entry · Bill text

  3. In effect Strength: moderate

    MI UIA MIDAS Reform Rules

    MI · Effective December 13, 2017 · MCL § 421.62a; 2017 Mich. Pub. Acts 224-228

    After Michigan's MIDAS automated fraud-detection system wrongly accused tens of thousands of unemployment claimants of fraud and seized their tax refunds, Michigan adopted statutory and regulatory reforms requiring human review before fraud determinations, restitution for wrongful determinations, and prohibition on fully automated fraud findings.

    View full entry · Statute

  4. In effect Strength: limited

    MI DOI AI Bulletin

    MI · Effective August 7, 2024 · Michigan DIFS Bulletin 2024-20-INS (2024-08-07)

    The MI Department of Insurance adopted the NAIC Model Bulletin on Use of Artificial Intelligence Systems by Insurers. Insurers licensed in MI must maintain a written AI program with governance, risk-management, testing, third-party-AI oversight, and documentation controls. The bulletin operationalizes existing unfair-trade-practice and unfair-discrimination law as applied to insurers' AI use cases — underwriting, pricing, claims, fraud detection, and marketing.

    View full entry · Agency page

  5. In effect Strength: stronger

    Sault Tribe (MI) AI Data Center Moratorium

    Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians · Effective April 7, 2026 · Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians Board Resolution (Apr. 7, 2026)

    Sault Tribe Board of Directors voted unanimously to halt any AI data center development on tribal lands indefinitely, citing strain on local resources and uncertain economic benefit. Came after dozens of community members spoke at public comment.

    View full entry · News report

  6. In effect Strength: limited

    MI AG AI scam alert

    MI · Effective August 15, 2024 · Mich. Comp. Laws § 445.903; MI OAG Press Release (Dec. 11, 2024)

    Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel issued an alert warning consumers about AI deepfake video scams, voice clones, and synthetic image fraud — including AI-generated investment ads using fake celebrity endorsements — and pledged enforcement under the Michigan Consumer Protection Act.

    View full entry · Agency page

  7. In effect Strength: limited

    Michigan Intimate Deep Fakes Act

    Michigan · Effective August 26, 2025 · 2025 Mich. Pub. Acts 10–11 (HB 4047–4048)

    Michigan makes it a crime to create or distribute AI-generated sexually explicit images of a real, identifiable person without their consent. First offenses carry up to one year in jail and a $3,000 fine; aggravated violations (posting online, extortion, prior conviction) escalate to a felony with up to three years. Victims may also sue for damages, injunctions, and up to $1,000/day for violating a restraining order.

    View full entry · Bill text

  8. In effect Strength: limited

    Adoption and Usage of Artificial Intelligence: Guidelines an

    Michigan · Effective August 9, 2025 · Adoption and Usage of Artificial Intelligence: Guidelines and Responsibilities

    Michigan's Department of Technology, Management and Budget issued guidelines establishing responsibilities for ethical AI use across state agencies, requiring data-classification awareness and human-in-the-loop review of AI-generated content.

    View full entry · Agency page

See all 19 Michigan AI rules

Federal AI rules that apply in Ann Arbor, Michigan

These federal rules apply everywhere in the United States, including Ann Arbor, Michigan. Showing the 10 strongest and most recent.

  1. In effect Strength: stronger

    TVA data center capacity commitment charge (2026)

    Tennessee Valley Authority · Effective October 1, 2026 · Tenn. Valley Auth. Bd. of Dirs. — Data Center Capacity Commitment Charge (approved Aug. 20, 2026; eff. Oct. 1, 2026)

    The Tennessee Valley Authority's Board of Directors approved a separate, higher wholesale rate for data centers on August 20, 2026, effective October 1. New or expanding data center loads above 5 megawatts now fall under a Capacity Commitment Charge attached to TVA's data center rate schedules, designed to recover the incremental capacity costs those customers impose on the system. The headline figures are substantial: upfront capacity commitment charges of roughly $1.5 million per megawatt, payable over three to five years, and an all-in average billing increase for data center customers of about 10%, phased in across three consecutive fiscal years. The stated purpose is to keep residential rates low while still serving growing data center demand. TVA matters here out of proportion to a single utility. It is a federal corporate agency supplying power across seven states, so this is not a state rate case but a regional cost-allocation decision reaching a large share of the Southeast — and TVA is among the first large US utilities to adopt a tariff aimed specifically at AI-driven load. Where most 2026 measures in this dataset restrict where data centers may be built, this one changes what they pay to run.

    View full entry · News report

  2. In effect Strength: stronger

    Bartz v. Anthropic

    N.D. Cal. · Effective September 5, 2025 · Bartz v. Anthropic PBC, No. 3:24-cv-05417 (N.D. Cal.)

    Authors Andrea Bartz, Charles Graeber, and Kirk Wallace Johnson sued Anthropic over its use of pirated-book datasets to train Claude. In June 2025 Judge William Alsup ruled that training on lawfully purchased books was fair use. The piracy claims (LibGen ingestion) proceeded toward settlement; in September 2025 Anthropic agreed to a $1.5 billion class settlement covering ~500,000 works. Judge Alsup granted preliminary approval September 25, 2025 and final approval July 20, 2026. The appeal period runs through August 19, 2026; class members will not receive payments until at least end of 2026.

    View full entry · Court record

  3. In effect Strength: stronger

    COPPA + 2025 Rule (childrens data)

    United States · Effective June 23, 2025 · 15 U.S.C. §§ 6501–6506; 16 C.F.R. Part 312

    COPPA requires online services aimed at children under 13 to get verifiable parental consent before collecting kids' personal data. The 2025 rule update — fully in effect since April 22, 2026 — adds biometric identifiers (like face templates and voiceprints, which matter for AI tools), requires separate parental consent before sharing children's data for targeted advertising, and tightens data retention limits.

    View full entry · Agency page

  4. In effect Strength: stronger

    TAKE IT DOWN Act

    United States · Effective May 19, 2025 · Pub. L. No. 119-12 (S. 146)

    Makes it a federal crime to knowingly publish intimate images of someone without consent, including AI-generated deepfakes. Social media and similar platforms must give victims a way to request removal and must take the content (and known copies) down within 48 hours. The platform removal requirement became enforceable May 19, 2026, and the FTC has already begun enforcement.

    View full entry · Agency page

  5. Blocked / in litigation

    NetChoice v. Yost (Ohio)

    S.D. Ohio · Effective April 16, 2025 · NetChoice, LLC v. Yost, No. 2:24-cv-00047 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 16, 2025)

    Ohio's Social Media Parental Notification Act — requiring parental consent for minors' social-media use, including algorithmic feeds — was preliminarily enjoined on February 12, 2024, then permanently enjoined on April 16, 2025 when the district court granted summary judgment for NetChoice. The state appealed to the Sixth Circuit, which vacated the district court's injunction in 2026.

    View full entry · Court record

  6. In effect Strength: stronger

    Thaler v. Perlmutter (Copyright)

    D.C. Cir. · Effective March 18, 2025 · Thaler v. Perlmutter, 130 F.4th 1039 (D.C. Cir. 2025)

    The companion copyright case: Stephen Thaler sought to register a copyright with 'Creativity Machine' (his AI) as the author. The D.C. Circuit affirmed in March 2025 that the Copyright Act's human-authorship requirement is dispositive as a matter of statutory law. AI cannot be a copyright author under U.S. law.

    View full entry · Court record

  7. In effect Strength: stronger

    Louis v. SafeRent

    D. Mass. · Effective November 20, 2024 · Louis v. SafeRent Solutions, LLC, No. 1:22-cv-10800 (D. Mass.)

    SafeRent agreed in November 2024 to a $2.275M settlement and a five-year ban on using its 'SafeRent Score' for housing-voucher applicants, after a class action alleged its AI tenant-screening tool systematically denied housing to Black and Hispanic Section 8 voucher holders. The first major AI tenant-screening Fair Housing Act settlement.

    View full entry · Court record

  8. In effect Strength: stronger

    FTC Impersonation Rule (AI)

    United States · Effective April 1, 2024 · 16 C.F.R. Part 461; 89 Fed. Reg. 15017

    The FTC's Impersonation Rule lets the agency directly sue scammers who pretend to be a government agency or a real business — including those who use AI-cloned voices or generated images to do so. Civil penalties can reach $53,088 per violation. The FTC also issued a supplemental notice in February 2024 proposing to extend the rule to all individual impersonation.

    View full entry · Agency page

  9. In effect Strength: stronger

    FTC v. Rite Aid

    FTC · Effective February 26, 2024 · FTC v. Rite Aid Corp., No. 2:23-cv-05023 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 19, 2023)

    The FTC banned Rite Aid from using facial-recognition technology in its stores for five years after finding the pharmacy chain's FRT system falsely tagged customers — disproportionately women and people of color — as shoplifters, leading to wrongful detentions and humiliations.

    View full entry · Agency page

  10. In effect Strength: stronger

    TCPA (AI voice calls)

    United States · Effective February 8, 2024 · 47 U.S.C. § 227; FCC 24-17

    Robocalls using AI-cloned or AI-generated voices are treated like other 'artificial voice' calls: callers need your prior express consent, must identify themselves, and must offer opt-outs for telemarketing. You can personally sue violators for $500 to $1,500 per illegal call.

    View full entry · Agency page

See all federal AI rules

Frequently asked questions about AI laws in Ann Arbor, Michigan

Are there AI laws in Ann Arbor, Michigan?
Ann Arbor, Michigan does not have any city-specific AI ordinances indexed in our database. However, 19 Michigan state-level rules and federal AI rules fully apply within the city limits. See the Michigan jurisdiction page for the full state-level breakdown.
What federal AI rules apply in Ann Arbor?
Every federal AI rule in our index applies in Ann Arbor, Michigan. The highest-strength federal rules currently include TVA data center capacity commitment charge (2026), Bartz v. Anthropic, COPPA + 2025 Rule (childrens data). 10+ federal entries are tracked in total.
Does Michigan have an AI privacy law?
Michigan has 6 privacy- or automated-decision-related AI rules in our index, including MI UIA MIDAS Reform Rules and MI SAVE Acts (2016 AV package). These apply to residents of Ann Arbor.
Are deepfakes illegal in Michigan?
Michigan has 5 deepfake- or AI-image-related laws in our index, including MI SOS Deepfake Election Policy and MI AG AI scam alert. Additionally, the federal TAKE IT DOWN Act covers non-consensual intimate-image deepfakes nationwide.
Can my employer use AI to screen me for jobs in Ann Arbor?
Employer use of AI to screen job applicants in Ann Arbor, Michigan is governed by MI UIA MIDAS Reform Rules and MI SAVE Acts (2016 AV package). Federal civil-rights and EEOC guidance also applies.
How do I report an AI law violation in Ann Arbor?
Most AI rules are enforced by an agency listed on each individual entry. For Michigan state laws, the Michigan Attorney General's office is the usual starting point. For federal AI rules, file complaints with the relevant federal agency (FTC, EEOC, HUD, CFPB, etc.) named on each entry. We also accept tips at feedback@ailawsusa.com.
Are facial recognition cameras allowed in Ann Arbor?
Facial-recognition use in Ann Arbor, Michigan is addressed by MI HB 6392 tort liability for AI misidentification. See those entries for what is allowed, who must comply, and enforcement details.
Is Ann Arbor regulated by Michigan's consumer privacy act?
Yes. Michigan state laws apply uniformly to residents and businesses operating in Ann Arbor. See the Michigan jurisdiction page for the complete list of consumer-protection and privacy rules.

Have we missed an AI rule in Ann Arbor?

This page is generated from our open civic dataset. If you know of a Ann Arbor ordinance, county rule, or local enforcement action we should add, email feedback@ailawsusa.com or submit a correction. Every entry must include a verifiable source.