AI Laws in Baton Rouge, Louisiana

AI Laws USA tracks 15 AI rules that apply to people and businesses in Baton Rouge, Louisiana: 10+ federal rules, 5 Louisiana state-level rules (no Baton Rouge-specific ordinances are indexed yet). Coverage is strongest on government use of AI, consumer data privacy, deepfakes, and non-consensual intimate imagery. 5 of these rules are already in effect. Each entry below links to its official source.

Baton Rouge local AI rules (and East Baton Rouge County)

No city- or county-specific AI ordinances are currently indexed for Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

  1. No local entries yet: we don't currently index any Baton Rouge-specific AI ordinances. Federal and Louisiana state rules still apply throughout the city. Have we missed something? Email feedback@ailawsusa.com.

Louisiana-level AI rules

5 Louisiana state rules apply to residents and businesses in Baton Rouge. Sorted strongest first.

  1. In effect Strength: limited

    Executive Order JML 25-109: Amended State Government's Use o

    Louisiana · Effective September 29, 2025 · Executive Order JML 25-109: Amended State Government's Use of AI

    Governor Jeff Landry's amended executive order requires Chief Information Officer or agency-head approval before any state agency uses AI, pauses AI procurement until December 15, 2025, mandates AI acquisition/information-management policies and an inventory of AI contracts and use cases, and restricts sensitive data inputs pending those policies.

    View full entry · Agency page

  2. In effect Strength: limited

    Artificial Intelligence Acceptable Use Policy

    Louisiana · Effective September 29, 2025 · Artificial Intelligence Acceptable Use Policy

    Louisiana's Office of Technology Services policy governs employee AI use, prohibiting entry of confidential/restricted state data into commercial AI, barring AI from making independent consequential decisions, and requiring human verification, AI-content labeling, and use of only state-approved systems.

    View full entry · Agency page

  3. In effect Strength: limited

    Artificial Intelligence in Louisiana Schools: Guidance for K

    Louisiana Department of Education (LDOE) · Effective August 28, 2024 · Artificial Intelligence in Louisiana Schools: Guidance for K-12 Schools

    Louisiana's education department, acting on its AI Task Force recommendations, released K-12 AI guidance including a four-tier use system (AI-Empowered/Enhanced/Assisted/Prohibited) and a cyclical framework for policy, stakeholders, and monitoring.

    View full entry · Agency page

  4. In effect Strength: limited

    LA Unlawful Deepfakes Law

    Louisiana · Effective August 1, 2023 · 2023 La. Acts No. 175; La. R.S. 14:73.13

    Louisiana's deepfake law carries some of the harshest penalties in the nation: creating or possessing sexual deepfakes of minors brings 5–20 years at hard labor; distributing them brings 10–30 years and up to $50,000. It also criminalizes nonconsensual sexual deepfakes of adults. Prosecutors have already charged people under it.

    View full entry · Bill text

  5. In effect Strength: limited

    Louisiana AI Intimate-Image Law (R.S. 14:73.14)

    Louisiana · Effective August 1, 2024 · La. R.S. 14:73.14 (2024 Reg. Sess. S.B. 6)

    Louisiana makes it a crime to distribute or sell AI-generated images or video that show a recognizable real person nude or in a state of undress, when the person doing so acts with intent to coerce, harass, intimidate, or otherwise maliciously and knows or should know they are not authorized to share or sell the material. Online services, email providers, and telecommunications carriers are generally not liable for content their users post. This is a separate offense from Louisiana's broader 'unlawful deepfakes' statute.

    View full entry · Statute

Full Louisiana jurisdiction page

Federal AI rules that apply in Baton Rouge, Louisiana

These federal rules apply everywhere in the United States, including Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Showing the 10 strongest and most recent.

  1. In effect Strength: stronger

    TVA data center capacity commitment charge (2026)

    Tennessee Valley Authority · Effective October 1, 2026 · Tenn. Valley Auth. Bd. of Dirs. — Data Center Capacity Commitment Charge (approved Aug. 20, 2026; eff. Oct. 1, 2026)

    The Tennessee Valley Authority's Board of Directors approved a separate, higher wholesale rate for data centers on August 20, 2026, effective October 1. New or expanding data center loads above 5 megawatts now fall under a Capacity Commitment Charge attached to TVA's data center rate schedules, designed to recover the incremental capacity costs those customers impose on the system. The headline figures are substantial: upfront capacity commitment charges of roughly $1.5 million per megawatt, payable over three to five years, and an all-in average billing increase for data center customers of about 10%, phased in across three consecutive fiscal years. The stated purpose is to keep residential rates low while still serving growing data center demand. TVA matters here out of proportion to a single utility. It is a federal corporate agency supplying power across seven states, so this is not a state rate case but a regional cost-allocation decision reaching a large share of the Southeast — and TVA is among the first large US utilities to adopt a tariff aimed specifically at AI-driven load. Where most 2026 measures in this dataset restrict where data centers may be built, this one changes what they pay to run.

    View full entry · News report

  2. In effect Strength: stronger

    Bartz v. Anthropic

    N.D. Cal. · Effective September 5, 2025 · Bartz v. Anthropic PBC, No. 3:24-cv-05417 (N.D. Cal.)

    Authors Andrea Bartz, Charles Graeber, and Kirk Wallace Johnson sued Anthropic over its use of pirated-book datasets to train Claude. In June 2025 Judge William Alsup ruled that training on lawfully purchased books was fair use. The piracy claims (LibGen ingestion) proceeded toward settlement; in September 2025 Anthropic agreed to a $1.5 billion class settlement covering ~500,000 works. Judge Alsup granted preliminary approval September 25, 2025 and final approval July 20, 2026. The appeal period runs through August 19, 2026; class members will not receive payments until at least end of 2026.

    View full entry · Court record

  3. In effect Strength: stronger

    COPPA + 2025 Rule (childrens data)

    United States · Effective June 23, 2025 · 15 U.S.C. §§ 6501–6506; 16 C.F.R. Part 312

    COPPA requires online services aimed at children under 13 to get verifiable parental consent before collecting kids' personal data. The 2025 rule update — fully in effect since April 22, 2026 — adds biometric identifiers (like face templates and voiceprints, which matter for AI tools), requires separate parental consent before sharing children's data for targeted advertising, and tightens data retention limits.

    View full entry · Agency page

  4. In effect Strength: stronger

    TAKE IT DOWN Act

    United States · Effective May 19, 2025 · Pub. L. No. 119-12 (S. 146)

    Makes it a federal crime to knowingly publish intimate images of someone without consent, including AI-generated deepfakes. Social media and similar platforms must give victims a way to request removal and must take the content (and known copies) down within 48 hours. The platform removal requirement became enforceable May 19, 2026, and the FTC has already begun enforcement.

    View full entry · Agency page

  5. Blocked / in litigation

    NetChoice v. Yost (Ohio)

    S.D. Ohio · Effective April 16, 2025 · NetChoice, LLC v. Yost, No. 2:24-cv-00047 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 16, 2025)

    Ohio's Social Media Parental Notification Act — requiring parental consent for minors' social-media use, including algorithmic feeds — was preliminarily enjoined on February 12, 2024, then permanently enjoined on April 16, 2025 when the district court granted summary judgment for NetChoice. The state appealed to the Sixth Circuit, which vacated the district court's injunction in 2026.

    View full entry · Court record

  6. In effect Strength: stronger

    Thaler v. Perlmutter (Copyright)

    D.C. Cir. · Effective March 18, 2025 · Thaler v. Perlmutter, 130 F.4th 1039 (D.C. Cir. 2025)

    The companion copyright case: Stephen Thaler sought to register a copyright with 'Creativity Machine' (his AI) as the author. The D.C. Circuit affirmed in March 2025 that the Copyright Act's human-authorship requirement is dispositive as a matter of statutory law. AI cannot be a copyright author under U.S. law.

    View full entry · Court record

  7. In effect Strength: stronger

    Louis v. SafeRent

    D. Mass. · Effective November 20, 2024 · Louis v. SafeRent Solutions, LLC, No. 1:22-cv-10800 (D. Mass.)

    SafeRent agreed in November 2024 to a $2.275M settlement and a five-year ban on using its 'SafeRent Score' for housing-voucher applicants, after a class action alleged its AI tenant-screening tool systematically denied housing to Black and Hispanic Section 8 voucher holders. The first major AI tenant-screening Fair Housing Act settlement.

    View full entry · Court record

  8. In effect Strength: stronger

    FTC Impersonation Rule (AI)

    United States · Effective April 1, 2024 · 16 C.F.R. Part 461; 89 Fed. Reg. 15017

    The FTC's Impersonation Rule lets the agency directly sue scammers who pretend to be a government agency or a real business — including those who use AI-cloned voices or generated images to do so. Civil penalties can reach $53,088 per violation. The FTC also issued a supplemental notice in February 2024 proposing to extend the rule to all individual impersonation.

    View full entry · Agency page

  9. In effect Strength: stronger

    FTC v. Rite Aid

    FTC · Effective February 26, 2024 · FTC v. Rite Aid Corp., No. 2:23-cv-05023 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 19, 2023)

    The FTC banned Rite Aid from using facial-recognition technology in its stores for five years after finding the pharmacy chain's FRT system falsely tagged customers — disproportionately women and people of color — as shoplifters, leading to wrongful detentions and humiliations.

    View full entry · Agency page

  10. In effect Strength: stronger

    TCPA (AI voice calls)

    United States · Effective February 8, 2024 · 47 U.S.C. § 227; FCC 24-17

    Robocalls using AI-cloned or AI-generated voices are treated like other 'artificial voice' calls: callers need your prior express consent, must identify themselves, and must offer opt-outs for telemarketing. You can personally sue violators for $500 to $1,500 per illegal call.

    View full entry · Agency page

See all federal AI rules

Frequently asked questions about AI laws in Baton Rouge, Louisiana

Are there AI laws in Baton Rouge, Louisiana?
Baton Rouge, Louisiana does not have any city-specific AI ordinances indexed in our database. However, 5 Louisiana state-level rules and federal AI rules fully apply within the city limits. See the Louisiana jurisdiction page for the full state-level breakdown.
What federal AI rules apply in Baton Rouge?
Every federal AI rule in our index applies in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. The highest-strength federal rules currently include TVA data center capacity commitment charge (2026), Bartz v. Anthropic, COPPA + 2025 Rule (childrens data). 10+ federal entries are tracked in total.
Does Louisiana have an AI privacy law?
Louisiana has 3 privacy- or automated-decision-related AI rules in our index, including Executive Order JML 25-109: Amended State Government's Use o and Artificial Intelligence Acceptable Use Policy. These apply to residents of Baton Rouge.
Are deepfakes illegal in Louisiana?
Louisiana has 2 deepfake- or AI-image-related laws in our index, including LA Unlawful Deepfakes Law and Louisiana AI Intimate-Image Law (R.S. 14:73.14). Additionally, the federal TAKE IT DOWN Act covers non-consensual intimate-image deepfakes nationwide.
Can my employer use AI to screen me for jobs in Baton Rouge?
Baton Rouge, Louisiana has no AI-employment-screening-specific rule in our index. Federal Title VII, ADA, and EEOC guidance still apply, plus any general Louisiana anti-discrimination statutes.
How do I report an AI law violation in Baton Rouge?
Most AI rules are enforced by an agency listed on each individual entry. For Louisiana state laws, the Louisiana Attorney General's office is the usual starting point. For federal AI rules, file complaints with the relevant federal agency (FTC, EEOC, HUD, CFPB, etc.) named on each entry. We also accept tips at feedback@ailawsusa.com.
Are facial recognition cameras allowed in Baton Rouge?
Baton Rouge, Louisiana has no facial-recognition-specific rule in our index. Use by private businesses is largely unregulated, while government use is governed by general Fourth Amendment and Louisiana law.
Is Baton Rouge regulated by Louisiana's consumer privacy act?
Yes. Louisiana state laws apply uniformly to residents and businesses operating in Baton Rouge. See the Louisiana jurisdiction page for the complete list of consumer-protection and privacy rules.

Have we missed an AI rule in Baton Rouge?

This page is generated from our open civic dataset. If you know of a Baton Rouge ordinance, county rule, or local enforcement action we should add, email feedback@ailawsusa.com or submit a correction. Every entry must include a verifiable source.